Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs i7 1360P

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with 14-cores against the 2.2 GHz i7 1360P with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 1360P and 125H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (7-Cores) integrated graphics: 3.9 vs 2.3 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 7 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 11 months later
  • Newer PCI Express version โ€“ 5.0
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • More than 10ยฐ C higher critical temperature
Advantages of Intel Core i7 1360P
  • 15% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2457 vs 2136 points
  • 11% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1090 MB/sec 1080 MB/sec
Clang compilation 78.8 Klines/sec 64.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 273.9 pages/sec 264.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 321.4 Mpixels/sec 309.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 226.1 pages/sec 211.5 pages/sec
Background blur 42.4 images/sec 40 images/sec
Photo processing 103.8 images/sec 103.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 17.6 Mpixels/sec 15.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 823 & 1073 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
20044
Integer math 67.6 GOps/sec 66.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 49.4 GOps/sec 45.2 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 85M Primes/sec 77M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 25.9M Strings/sec 22.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.5 GBytes/sec 12.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 222.3 MBytes/sec 199.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 1359 Frames/sec 1266 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 12.9B Matrices/sec 11.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 2263 & 1998 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
137.14
130.96

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 25.3 PPW 20 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 359.9 PPW 365.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 715.9 PPW 653 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.9 PPW 4.68 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-07 (Dazzy G)Geekbench 6 CPU2266 / 11468
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-25 (SunrayVision)Geekbench 6 CPU2314 / 11107
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-25 (SunrayVision)Cinebench 2024103 / 763
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-05 (Fadaf)Geekbench 6 CPU2221 / 11456
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-11-30 (ilikememe)Geekbench 6 CPU2201 / 11410
Intel Core i7 1360P
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-22 (ลฝeljko Periฤ‡)Geekbench 6 CPU2602 / 12296
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-22 (ลฝeljko Periฤ‡)Cinebench 2024110 / 726
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-03-15 (lee404)Geekbench 6 CPU2198 / 7305
๐Ÿ“˜ 2024-11-15 (Asuna)Cinebench 202483 / 395

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and i7 1360P

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 14, 2023 January 3, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Meteor Lake Raptor Lake
Model number 125H i7-1360P
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (7-Cores) Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H -
Intel CPU rating (140th and 141st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 8 8
Base Frequency (P) 1.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.5 GHz 5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 8
E-Threads 10 8
Base Frequency (E) 0.7 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Total
Total Cores 14 12
Total Threads 18 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 12x 22x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 7 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 20-28 W (configurable) 20-28 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W 64 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 BGA-1744
Peak Temperature 110ยฐC 100ยฐC
Laptop processors ranking (180th and 184th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (7-Cores) Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2200 MHz 1500 MHz
Shading Units 896 768
TMUs 56 48
ROPs 24 24
Execution Units 112 96
TGP 28 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
3.9 TFLOPS
2.3 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
- DDR5-5200
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
- LPDDR5x-6400
- LPDDR4x-4267
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 5 125H official page Intel Core i7 1360P official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
82 (82%)
18 (18%)
Total votes: 100

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 1360P or Ultra 5 125H?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd February 23, 2025 at 04:36 PM
For mini-PCs at least, the Intel core i7 1360P holds up well. More snappy, competitive on a multi-core level, and good for photo editing. The latest Intel Ultra 5 125 H pulls out ahead massively for the iGPU, NPU, and power efficiency. Found in the Asus NUC Pro 14 mini-PC, it is the better option for those that need the GPU for gaming or work needs.
+10 Reply