Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Ultra 7 155H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 258V with 8-cores against the 1.4 GHz Ultra 7 155H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 155H and 258V
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Newer - released 9 months later
  • 13% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2745 vs 2421 points
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • Supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5-7467 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (8-Cores) integrated graphics: 4.6 vs 4 TFLOPS
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 544
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 3749
Cinebench Scores (#165th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1020 MB/sec 1220 MB/sec
Clang compilation 66.1 Klines/sec 100.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 287.7 pages/sec 270.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 295.6 Mpixels/sec 356.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 276.7 pages/sec 243.4 pages/sec
Background blur 46.5 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Photo processing 113.9 images/sec 117.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 14 Mpixels/sec 19.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 42.9 GOps/sec 85.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 57.4 GOps/sec 62.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 185M Primes/sec 113M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 21.6M Strings/sec 31.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.5 GBytes/sec 16.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 176.6 MBytes/sec 273.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 1565 Frames/sec 1701 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 14.7B Matrices/sec 16.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2133 & 6648 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 17.2 PPW 14.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 291.9 PPW 192.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 510.4 PPW 377.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.48 PPW 2.65 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (THINKPAD T16 GEN4)Cinebench 2024122 / 584
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Matty)Cinebench 2024113 / 512
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 CPU2869 / 11446
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)Geekbench 6 CPU2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)Geekbench 6 CPU2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and Ultra 7 155H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released September 4, 2024 December 14, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Lunar Lake Meteor Lake
Model number 258V 155H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel CPU rating (88th and 99th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 6
P-Threads 4 12
Base Frequency (P) 2.2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 10
E-Threads 4 10
Base Frequency (E) 2.2 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 8 16
Total Threads 8 22
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 22x 14x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 112K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 17-37 W (configurable) 20-65 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2833 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (111th and 128th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 600 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1950 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1024
TMUs - 64
ROPs - 32
Execution Units - 128
TGP 30 W 28 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533 - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 32 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 258V official page Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 8 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
128 (33.3%)
256 (66.7%)
Total votes: 384

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Ultra 7 258V?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Eto September 9, 2026 at 03:48 AM
Interesting comparison..I thought newer means better
0 Reply
Avatar
Messier83 October 29, 2025 at 10:47 PM
I don't get it why the 155h is ahead over iGpu rating....in real world use the 258v iGpu show 30-40% more framerates than the 155h
+34 Reply
Avatar
Randlemahn July 12, 2025 at 02:02 PM
Gonna get the 155h for Roblox, netflix and YouTube, that oled is gonna look GREAT. ofc ima do an undervolt on the CPU since I use on my lap, 103C isn't something to be proud of.
+5 Reply
Avatar
mircea February 21, 2025 at 01:09 AM
Biggest benefit will be battery life, being way better than the previous generation.
+38 Reply
Avatar
LouieTK December 16, 2024 at 12:11 AM
Trying to choose between these two in a laptop purchase over the next week. Is there value to the Ultra 7 258V having NPU support and being Copilot+ certified for >40 TOPS? I.e., though having fewer cores and threads than the 155H, will the 258V be more future-proof for AI purposes? Thanks for any guidance.
+136 Reply
Avatar
Eta August 2, 2025 at 05:18 AM
To date no AI even for 100 series NPU support nor 200 series... I feel scammed lol
0 Reply
Avatar
Messier83 September 25, 2025 at 12:28 AM
There's a way to install localised AI(Local Stablediffusion and Local LLM) for the PCs even with iGpu only but i never see anything of these run on the intel NPU unit especially the Intel Playground only uses the Arc iGpu in local AI progress
+1 Reply
Avatar
Core Ultra 7 155H November 15, 2024 at 11:25 AM
Has more advantages over Ultra 7 258V. Though 258V is newer than 155H, instead of being upgraded from all aspects, it got downgraded in necessary aspects like, multi-core performance, graphics performance, mainly no. of course (from 16 straight down to 8!!!), etc...
+156 Reply
Avatar
guy August 1, 2025 at 07:02 AM
how ever its battery efficiency got upgraded. Plus 258v's iGpu is better than 155h's iGpu . 258v's iGpu can do better than 155h's iGpu in intense works like gaming. You can search it up on youtube.
0 Reply
Avatar
Eto August 2, 2025 at 05:20 AM
guy, These are my same thoughts ... I love gaming... And for once with 125u I'm able to travel without having to carry my gaming pc and still play with my primary laptop lol... My next laptop should be the 200 series but with dual fans
0 Reply