Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 7 155H or Ryzen 7 8845HS: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

57 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
VS
61 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with 16-cores against the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments (9)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 8845HS and 155H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 7 nanometers
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 7 155H
vs
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 544 570
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 3749 4125
Cinebench Scores (165th and 175th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1220 MB/sec 1120 MB/sec
Clang compilation 100.8 Klines/sec 96.4 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 270.5 pages/sec 278.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 356.1 Mpixels/sec 374.3 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 243.4 pages/sec 261.9 pages/sec
Background blur 49.2 images/sec 59.9 images/sec
Photo processing 117.2 images/sec 110.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 19.4 Mpixels/sec 22.3 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 & 158 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 85.8 GOps/sec 97 GOps/sec
Floating point math 62.5 GOps/sec 58.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 113M Primes/sec 86M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 31.6M Strings/sec 41.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 16.1 GBytes/sec 20.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 273.8 MBytes/sec 341.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 1701 Frames/sec 1339 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 16.2B Matrices/sec 25.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 6648 & 3870 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
Core Ultra 7 155H
172.02
Ryzen 7 8845HS +19%
205.32

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 14.7 PPW 17.3 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 192.5 PPW 241.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 377.1 PPW 523.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 2.65 PPW 3.8 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)Geekbench 6 CPU2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)Geekbench 6 CPU2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930
Add View all (13)
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-15 (korn87)Cinebench 2026570 / 4125
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (korn87)Geekbench 6 CPU2718 / 13855
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (korn87)Cinebench 2026570 / 4125
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-09 (MaidElle)Geekbench 6 CPU2514 / 12971
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 CPU2331 / 10135
Add View all (18)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released December 14, 2023 December 6, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Meteor Lake Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Model number 155H -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Radeon 780M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 7 255H - AMD Ryzen 7 260
Intel CPU rating (#99th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#60th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 8
P-Threads 12 16
Base Frequency (P) 1.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 -
E-Threads 10 -
Base Frequency (E) 0.9 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 8
Total Threads 22 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 14x 38x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors - 25 billions
Fabrication Process 7 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 20-65 W (configurable) 35-54 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 FP8
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (128th and 92nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Radeon 780M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 800 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2250 MHz 2700 MHz
Shading Units 1024 768
TMUs 64 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 128 12
TGP 28 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra 7 155H +12%
4.6 TFLOPS
Ryzen 7 8845HS
4.1 TFLOPS
More info: Radeon 780M compared to Arc iGPU (8-Cores)

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600		 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5x-7500
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s -
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
146 (15.4%)
800 (84.6%)
Total votes: 946

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Apple M4 (10-Core) (1)
2. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (3)
3. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i7 13700H (9)
4. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (8)
5. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10)
6. Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155U (6)
7. AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (12)
8. AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS (1)
9. AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
10. AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Intel Core i7 13620H (1)
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
JustAGuy November 26, 2024 at 11:07 AM
Crazy how a cheaper ryzen cpu outplays the more expensive intel ultra bullcrap. AMD for the win
+45 Reply
Avatar
Cat Fat July 1, 2024 at 05:12 PM
Ryzen destroys Intel. It's factual.
+86 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd February 6, 2025 at 12:55 AM
For power efficiency, yes. In performance, not so much. A lead that isn't noticeable (less than 5%) by a normal human eye.
+8 Reply
Avatar
Roger June 18, 2024 at 11:38 PM
ARC will have a couple of niche advantages in encoding and decoding, depending on adoption and support. Otherwise, the two devices are really close. However, Intel is trailing behind. Both are going to consume more power than advertised, which really has to give the 4nm chip an edge. Intel has a pretty significant cache advantage, which is probably why it can still compete. At the end of the day, it really is about flops per watt. When these get benchmarked at locked-down power, we will see who the true winner is. I've purchased the Dell 8845HS. Both Intel and Asus need to step up their game!
+35 Reply
Avatar
LaptopDealsEU May 28, 2024 at 07:14 AM
Ultra are processors ideally suited for business laptops - better battery and better iGPU. 8845HS are laptops more efficient in multithreading for more productive tasks. In a gaming laptop it is better to take the 8845HS. In a business laptop it will certainly be the Ultra.
+36 Reply
Avatar
FKcoder June 15, 2024 at 01:50 AM
Not really, 8845HS is more power efficient as its built on 4nm while 155H is built on 7nm. Even the 8840hs will walk over the park on 155h.
+70 Reply
Avatar
Shiny4head June 25, 2024 at 05:54 PM
On almost every benchmarking video, the 780M is always superior to ARC graphics.
+35 Reply
Avatar
Adrian Zaharia October 7, 2024 at 03:27 PM
It is quite the opposite mate. Intel Ultra has more cores thand AMD Ryzen 7. MT tasks will work better on Intel due to the core count being higher. More cores = more power consumption. AMD will give you a longer battery life(+10/15%). Intel ARC on the Ultra proccesor model will give you better performance but a max 10% compared to AMD's 780M.
+24 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd October 13, 2024 at 01:30 AM
Correction: Ryzen 7 8845HS CPU are more efficient in multi-threading for extreme tasks on the computer. One can be productive and not take a heavy toll on the computer hardware.
+39 Reply
EnglishРусский