Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Ultra 7 155H

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 1.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra X7 358H against the 1.4 GHz Ultra 7 155H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 155H and 358H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
  • Newer - released 2 years and 1 month later
  • More modern manufacturing process – 2 versus 7 nanometers
  • Around 64 GB/s (71%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • More powerful Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics: 7.7 vs 4.6 TFLOPS
  • 17% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2839 vs 2421 points
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 502 544
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4689 3749
Cinebench Scores (32nd and 43rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1210 MB/sec 1220 MB/sec
Clang compilation 98.2 Klines/sec 100.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 371.3 pages/sec 270.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 368 Mpixels/sec 356.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 293 pages/sec 243.4 pages/sec
Background blur 59.2 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Photo processing 118.3 images/sec 117.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 19.7 Mpixels/sec 19.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 82.8 GOps/sec 85.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 103.3 GOps/sec 62.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 336M Primes/sec 113M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 40.2M Strings/sec 31.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 25.9 GBytes/sec 16.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 331.3 MBytes/sec 273.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 3011 Frames/sec 1701 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 27.2B Matrices/sec 16.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 334 & 6648 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 44.6 PPW 14.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 682.5 PPW 192.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1346.9 PPW 377.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 11.27 PPW 2.65 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxGeekbench 6 CPU2910 / 17150
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 2024126 / 1182
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 20260 / 4753
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)Geekbench 6 CPU2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)Geekbench 6 CPU2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Ultra 7 155H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 December 14, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Meteor Lake
Model number 358H 155H
Integrated GPU Arc B390 Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Intel CPU rating (39th and 100th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 6
P-Threads 4 12
Base Frequency (P) 1.9 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 10
E-Threads 12 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.5 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 16 22
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 19x 14x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 112K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 20-65 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (48th and 129th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc B390 Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1024
TMUs 48 64
ROPs 24 32
Execution Units 12 128
TGP 30 W 28 W
iGPU FLOPS
7.7 TFLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600 - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra X7 358H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
5 (83.3%)
1 (16.7%)
Total votes: 6

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Ultra X7 358H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!