Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs i7 10700

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20-cores against the 2.9 GHz i7 10700 with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
68.9
(Good)
Value Index
17.8
(Bad)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 10700 and 265
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 14 nanometers
  • Newer - released 4 years and 8 months later
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Has 14 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 68% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2910 vs 1731 points
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#82nd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18843
File compression 1340 MB/sec 563.4 MB/sec
Clang compilation 189 Klines/sec 66.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 378.8 pages/sec 163.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 525.9 Mpixels/sec 259.4 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 326.6 pages/sec 171.3 pages/sec
Background blur 78.5 images/sec 36.3 images/sec
Photo processing 138.5 images/sec 65.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.5 Mpixels/sec 13 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 625 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
49668
Integer math 134.7 GOps/sec 62.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 172.7 GOps/sec 38.7 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 419M Primes/sec 46M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 63.8M Strings/sec 31.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 40.4 GBytes/sec 5.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 522.8 MBytes/sec 249.9 MBytes/sec
Physics 2920 Frames/sec 785 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 41.5B Matrices/sec 16.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2008 & 6273 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
339.56
142.06

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 21.5 PPW 7.6 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 289.9 PPW 121 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 764.1 PPW 245.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 5.22 PPW 2.19 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-18 (supertimm)Cinebench 2024117 / 1831
Intel Core i7 10700
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-04 (koni)Cinebench 2026375 / 2607
📘 2026-05-15 (Texassky)Cinebench 202477 / 709
📘 2024-11-23 (Adam)Cinebench 202473 / 491

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and i7 10700

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 18, 2024 May 1, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Comet Lake
Model number 265 i7-10700
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics UHD Graphics 630
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel CPU rating (#23rd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.4 GHz 2.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 -
E-Threads 12 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 20 8
Total Threads 20 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 24x 29x
Bus Bandwidth - 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 14 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 182 W -
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1200
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (32nd and 150th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock - 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1950 MHz 1200 MHz
Shading Units - 192
TMUs - 24
ROPs - 3
Execution Units - 24
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR4-2933
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 45.8 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265 official page Intel Core i7 10700 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 10700 or Ultra 7 265?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!