Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 7 265F or Core i7 13700F: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs i7 13700F

78 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
VS
67 out of 100
Intel Core i7 13700F
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Intel Core i7 13700F

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20-cores against the 2.1 GHz i7 13700F with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
66.0
(Good)
Value Index
39.2
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13700F and 265F
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 2 years later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • 13% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3034 vs 2690 points
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 7 265F
vs
Core i7 13700F

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (69th and 87th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1350 MB/sec 1340 MB/sec
Clang compilation 189.3 Klines/sec 148.5 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 439.7 pages/sec 393.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 561.5 Mpixels/sec 430.5 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 334.5 pages/sec 274.4 pages/sec
Background blur 84.8 images/sec 67.3 images/sec
Photo processing 153.2 images/sec 138.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.4 Mpixels/sec 35.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 976 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 138 GOps/sec 139.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 173.6 GOps/sec 98.7 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 415M Primes/sec 153M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 62.4M Strings/sec 49.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 39.5 GBytes/sec 26.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 506.9 MBytes/sec 462.9 MBytes/sec
Physics 3165 Frames/sec 2197 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 39.2B Matrices/sec 27.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 852 & 2798 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
Core Ultra 7 265F +2%
327.89
Core i7 13700F
319.98

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 23.1 PPW 20.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 306.5 PPW 256.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 580.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 5.04 PPW 4.92 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-02-02 (Patriot)GeekBench3198 / 22864
Add View all (1)
Intel Core i7 13700F
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-10-25 (AL)Cinebench 2024109 / 1379
📘 2024-09-21 (KSL)Cinebench 2024113 / 765
📘 2023-11-07 (ThickDMEAT)Cinebench 2024112 / 1325
Add View all (3)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and i7 13700F

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 18, 2024 January 3, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Raptor Lake
Model number 265F i7-13700F
Integrated GPU No No
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Intel CPU rating (17th and 57th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 8
E-Threads 12 8
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz 4.1 GHz
Total
Total Cores 20 16
Total Threads 20 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 24x 21x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 30MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 182 W 219 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (25th and 55th place)

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265F official page Intel Core i7 13700F official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
5 (71.4%)
2 (28.6%)
Total votes: 7

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
2. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265
3. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7 14700F
4. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
5. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700
6. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
7. Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
8. Intel Core i7 13700F vs Intel Core i7 13700KF
9. Intel Core i7 13700F vs Intel Core i7 14700F
10. Intel Core i7 13700F vs Intel Core i7 13700K
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 13700F or Ultra 7 265F?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский