Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20-cores against the 4.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Value for money (Beta)
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
- Has 12 more physical cores
- More modern manufacturing process โ 3 versus 4 nanometers
- Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
- More than 10ยฐ C higher critical temperature
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.2 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
- Has 66 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- Includes an integrated GPU Radeon Graphics
- 9% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3315 vs 3034 points
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
| Cinebench 2026 (Single) | - | 708 |
| Cinebench 2026 (Multi) | - | 5087 |
Cinebench Scores (69th and 86th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1350 MB/sec | 1730 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 189.3 Klines/sec | 140.3 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 439.7 pages/sec | 356.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 561.5 Mpixels/sec | 509 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 334.5 pages/sec | 337 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 84.8 images/sec | 90.4 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 153.2 images/sec | 135.2 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 41.4 Mpixels/sec | 29.1 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 138 GOps/sec | 116.6 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 173.6 GOps/sec | 79.4 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 415M Primes/sec | 420M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 62.4M Strings/sec | 48.4M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 39.5 GBytes/sec | 22.1 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 506.9 MBytes/sec | 467.2 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 3165 Frames/sec | 4071 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 39.2B Matrices/sec | 38.7B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 23.1 PPW | 11.1 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 306.5 PPW | 152.9 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 759.8 PPW | 332.7 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 5.04 PPW | 2.68 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ 2026-02-02 (Patriot) | GeekBench | 3198 / 22864 |
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ 2026-08-28 (Average) | Cinebench 2026 | 735 / 5624 |
| ๐ 2026-08-17 (looch) | Cinebench 2026 | 708 / 5087 |
| ๐ 2026-07-20 (szegi) | Cinebench 2024 | 138 / 1365 |
| ๐ 2026-07-08 (Spice Master) | Cinebench 2026 | 764 / 5801 |
| ๐ 2026-05-08 (ChronicallyEve) | Cinebench 2026 | 721 / 5465 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | December 18, 2024 | October 31, 2024 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) |
| Model number | 265F | 9800X3D |
| Integrated GPU | No | Radeon Graphics |
Intel CPU rating (#17th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#14th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.3 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| E-Cores | 12 | - |
| E-Threads | 12 | - |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.8 GHz | - |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.6 GHz | - |
| Total Cores | 20 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 24x | 47x |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 3MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 30MB (shared) | 96MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 65 W | 120 W |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 182 W | 162 W |
| Socket | FCLGA-1851 | AM5 |
| Peak Temperature | 105ยฐC | 95ยฐC |
Desktop CPU ranking (25th and 26th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | - | Radeon Graphics |
| GPU Base Clock | - | 400 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | - | 2200 MHz |
| Shading Units | - | 128 |
| TMUs | - | 8 |
| ROPs | - | 4 |
| Execution Units | - | 2 |
| TGP | - | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - DDR5-6400 | - DDR5-5600 |
| Max. Memory Size | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | - | 89.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 7 265F official page | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 24 | 28 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 26