Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs i7 10700KF

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF with 20-cores against the 3.8 GHz i7 10700KF with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
103.4
(Excellent)
Value Index
11.1
(Bad)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 10700KF and 265KF
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 14 nanometers
  • Newer - released 4 years and 6 months later
  • Has 12 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Has 14 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 85% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3206 vs 1737 points
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#21st place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1610 MB/sec 670.6 MB/sec
Clang compilation 192.6 Klines/sec 74.5 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 481.8 pages/sec 189.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 600.3 Mpixels/sec 289.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 342.1 pages/sec 175.2 pages/sec
Background blur 96.8 images/sec 42.7 images/sec
Photo processing 172.7 images/sec 76 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.9 Mpixels/sec 14.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]748 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 143.3 GOps/sec 66.1 GOps/sec
Floating point math 189.4 GOps/sec 41.1 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 487M Primes/sec 54M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 79.7M Strings/sec 36.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption 48.2 GBytes/sec 6.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 666.5 MBytes/sec 292 MBytes/sec
Physics 3629 Frames/sec 926 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 54.5B Matrices/sec 19.5B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4]3726 & 2035 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
455.75

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.5 PPW 5.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 174.2 PPW 70.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 468.1 PPW 146.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.65 PPW 1.41 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-12 (AitorIrigoyen)Cinebench 2024137 / 2011
📘 2026-07-11 (AitorIrigoyen🇺🇾)Cinebench 2024137 / 2011
📘 2026-01-30 (Obfuscator)Cinebench 2024146 / 2162
📘 2026-01-07 (introfog)Cinebench 2024140 / 2062
📘 2025-12-31 (HomeHoney)Cinebench 2024139 / 2009
Intel Core i7 10700KF
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2023-09-25 (Help)Cinebench 202474 / 636

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and i7 10700KF

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 11, 2024 May 1, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Comet Lake
Model number 265KF i7-10700KF
Integrated GPU No No
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 9700X -
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Intel CPU rating (#5th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.9 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 -
E-Threads 12 -
Base Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 20 8
Total Threads 20 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 39x 38x
Bus Bandwidth - 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 14 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W -
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1200
Peak Temperature 105°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (12th and 140th place)

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR4-2933
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 45.8 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF official page Intel Core i7 10700KF official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 10700KF or Ultra 7 265KF?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!