AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 1 year and 2 months newer Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) that utilizes 64 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc iGPU (4-Cores) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
  • 3.3x higher maximum theoretical performance (2 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Achieves 3.2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (16K vs 5K)
  • Has 4x more shading units (512 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 -
1080p Ultra - -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 -
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 -
Wild Life Extreme 998 -
Night Raid 7335 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
16321
Background Blur 12 img/sec 37.6 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 17.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 60 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 3695.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 -
DirectX 11 17 FPS -
DirectX 12 7 FPS -
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5]194 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9]43 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 2902
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 5473
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 2967
Face Detection (HP) 2153 6068
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 8220
Text Classification (SP) 713 609
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 1146
Object Detection (SP) 709 2766
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 6405
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 26796
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 December 14, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Xe LPG
GPU Codename Mendocino -
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 740M
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 125U or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
- and 12 more
Laptop GPU ranking (124th and 96th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 1750-2000 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 64
Ray-tracing Cores 2 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 768KB shared
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 28-32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 56-64 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
1.8-2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 14 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 5 nm
Die Size 122 mm² -
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
2 (13.3%)
13 (86.7%)
Total votes: 15

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!