Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
69
out of 100
VS
82
out of 100
We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H against the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
- More modern manufacturing process β 3 versus 4 nanometers
- Newer PCI Express version β 5.0
- More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
- 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
- More powerful Radeon 8060S integrated graphics: 14.8 vs 4.8 TFLOPS
- Has 40 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- Supports quad-channel memory
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
| Cinebench 2026 (Single) | 506 | 619 |
| Cinebench 2026 (Multi) | 4879 | 7559 |
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 38th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1510 MB/sec | 2050 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 129.7 Klines/sec | 202 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 425.7 pages/sec | 527.3 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 522.7 Mpixels/sec | 586.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 309.2 pages/sec | 339.2 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 73.9 images/sec | 72.8 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 159.5 images/sec | 200 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 26.8 Mpixels/sec | 45.8 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 86 GOps/sec | 200.8 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 109.3 GOps/sec | 128.8 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 330M Primes/sec | 303M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 41M Strings/sec | 76.2M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 26.2 GBytes/sec | 35.5 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 336.1 MBytes/sec | 691 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 2512 Frames/sec | 3481 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 26.8B Matrices/sec | 56.4B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 24.9 PPW | 15.5 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 381.6 PPW | 186.4 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 759.8 PPW | 458 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 4.56 PPW | 3.51 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2756 / 16837 |
| π 2026-01-16 (AsNapur) | Cinebench 2024 | 122 / 1126 |
| π 2025-10-31 (Adi) | Cinebench 2024 | 114 / 804 |
| π 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2868 / 14847 |
| π 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury) | Cinebench 2024 | 117 / 1122 |
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-20 -> Rhynd | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2885 / 20105 |
| π 2026-04-23 -> Rhynd | Cinebench 2026 | 619 / 7559 |
| π 2026-04-20 (Rhynd) | Cinebench 2026 | 608 / 7101 |
| π 2025-09-11 (dsc) | Cinebench 2024 | 115 / 1855 |
| π 2025-06-30 (Declan) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2744 / 17850 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395General
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | January 6, 2025 | January 7, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Halo) |
| Model number | 285H | - |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon 8060S |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) |
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#8th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 6 | 16 |
| P-Threads | 6 | 32 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.9 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| E-Cores | 10 | - |
| E-Threads | 10 | - |
| Base Frequency (E) | 2.7 GHz | - |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.5 GHz | - |
| Total Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 30x |
| L1 Cache | 112K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 35-45 W (configurable) | 45-120 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 115 W | - |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP11 |
| Peak Temperature | 110Β°C | 100Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 16th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics 140T | Radeon 8060S |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1295 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 64 | 160 |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| Execution Units | 8 | 40 |
| TGP | 35 W | 55 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 8060S compared to Arc 140T
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max. Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | - | 256 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 28 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 92