Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs i7 14700K

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285K with 24-cores against the 3.4 GHz i7 14700K with 20-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
58.3
(Average)
Value Index
68.7
(Good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 14700K and 285K
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • More powerful Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 2 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • Newer - released 1 year later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Around 12.8 GB/s (14%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 12% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3379 vs 3012 points
Advantages of Intel Core i7 14700K
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.6 GHz vs 5.5 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 668
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 7576
Cinebench Scores (11th and 36th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1560 MB/sec 1620 MB/sec
Clang compilation 242.2 Klines/sec 189.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 479.5 pages/sec 483.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 622.1 Mpixels/sec 547.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 371.2 pages/sec 301.5 pages/sec
Background blur 95.4 images/sec 76.9 images/sec
Photo processing 164.2 images/sec 169.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 52.3 Mpixels/sec 43.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 1105 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 172.3 GOps/sec 181.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 224.2 GOps/sec 133.3 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 542M Primes/sec 210M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 94.9M Strings/sec 74.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption 57.7 GBytes/sec 39.8 GBytes/sec
Data compression 789.7 MBytes/sec 688.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 3933 Frames/sec 2925 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 62.3B Matrices/sec 40.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 8455 & 8587 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
554.43

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 18.1 PPW 14.9 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 184.8 PPW 162.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 537.8 PPW 415.6 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.44 PPW 3.6 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Olafur Torfi)Cinebench 2024142 / 2242
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-01 (aDamatGeek)Cinebench 2024142 / 2383
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-29 (GeneralJeep)Geekbench 6 CPU3134 / 21707
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-31 (Szymon919191)Cinebench 2024141 / 2261
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-26 (Bill)Geekbench 6 CPU3207 / 22197
Intel Core i7 14700K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-02 (Harley)Cinebench 2026668 / 7576
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-10 (Lonewulf32)Cinebench 2024138 / 2162
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-05 (MrCoffee)Cinebench 2024124 / 1873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-24 (MiMi)Cinebench 2024128 / 1892
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-15 (AdKraemer)Cinebench 2024122 / 1978

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and i7 14700K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 11, 2024 October 16, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Raptor Lake Refresh
Model number 285K i7-14700K
Integrated GPU Arc iGPU (4-Cores) UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X - AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
Intel CPU rating (3rd and 16th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.7 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.5 GHz 5.6 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 12
E-Threads 16 12
Base Frequency (E) 3.2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz 4.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 24 20
Total Threads 24 28
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 34x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 33MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W 253 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 100Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (8th and 25th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 1600 MHz
Shading Units 512 256
TMUs 32 16
ROPs 16 8
Execution Units 64 32
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
2 TFLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285K official page Intel Core i7 14700K official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
11 (39.3%)
17 (60.7%)
Total votes: 28

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 14700K or Ultra 9 285K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!