Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus with 24-cores against the 2.5 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9955HX3D and Plus
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 2 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Newer - released 1 year later
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.5 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  • Has 92 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 588 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 9708 -
Cinebench Scores (8th and 14th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1660 MB/sec 1620 MB/sec
Clang compilation 217.2 Klines/sec 231.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 495.3 pages/sec 343 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 584.4 Mpixels/sec 561.9 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 342.8 pages/sec 348.1 pages/sec
Background blur 84 images/sec 71.3 images/sec
Photo processing 160.2 images/sec 121.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 46.4 Mpixels/sec 56.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 165.3 GOps/sec 222 GOps/sec
Floating point math 201.5 GOps/sec 143.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 514M Primes/sec 525M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 80M Strings/sec 83.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 50 GBytes/sec 39.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 656.5 MBytes/sec 783.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 3361 Frames/sec 4676 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 51B Matrices/sec 62.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 165 & 409 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 44.2 PPW 28.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 392.4 PPW 268.2 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1077.7 PPW 832.9 PPW
Blender / Watt - 7.55 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-07 (Yolo)Cinebench 2024130 / 2160
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-10-21 (Sam)Cinebench 2024128 / 2105

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 17, 2026 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Fire Range)
Model number 290HX+ 9955HX3D
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 610M
Intel CPU rating (#4th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#10th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 8 32
Base Frequency (P) 2.7 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.5 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.7 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 24 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 27x 25x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 128MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 55-75 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W 101 W
Socket FCBGA-2114 FL1
Peak Temperature 105ยฐC 100ยฐC
Laptop processors ranking (11th and 18th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 610M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 512 128
TMUs 32 8
ROPs 16 4
Execution Units 64 2
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
2 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s -
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus official page AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
59 (61.5%)
37 (38.5%)
Total votes: 96

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D or Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Kaitronys August 7, 2026 at 02:52 PM
290HX is better overall and is more efficient, X3D is only for gaming
+9 Reply
Avatar
1.1.1.1 July 13, 2026 at 11:48 PM
9955HX3D > 290HX TRASH LOL
+7 Reply
Avatar
X3X July 16, 2026 at 05:02 AM
No
+5 Reply