Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
70
out of 100
VS
73
out of 100
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Core Ultra X7 368H with 16-cores against the 2.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
- Newer - released 1 year and 6 months later
- More modern manufacturing process – 2 versus 4 nanometers
- Has 4 more physical cores
- Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
- More powerful Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics: 7.7 vs 5.9 TFLOPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
- Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
- Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (90th and 96th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1450 MB/sec | 1270 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 131.5 Klines/sec | 131.2 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 459.5 pages/sec | 304 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 512.1 Mpixels/sec | 480.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 301.9 pages/sec | 316.2 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 71 images/sec | 74.1 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 177.8 images/sec | 135.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 27.9 Mpixels/sec | 32.6 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 87.6 GOps/sec | 124.4 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 105.8 GOps/sec | 78.3 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 325M Primes/sec | 129M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 38.7M Strings/sec | 48.5M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 25.5 GBytes/sec | 22.3 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 317.4 MBytes/sec | 446.6 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 2893 Frames/sec | 1911 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 26.2B Matrices/sec | 32B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 52.1 PPW | 23.6 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 646.9 PPW | 300.7 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1328.8 PPW | 654.5 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 7.91 PPW | - |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-10-31 (DavidchoGamer84) | Cinebench 2024 | 121 / 1277 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375General
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | January 5, 2026 | July 24, 2024 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Panther Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Point) |
| Model number | 368H | 375 |
| Integrated GPU | Arc B390 | Radeon 890M |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - Intel Core i9 14900HX |
| Successor | - | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 |
Intel CPU rating (#41st place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#27th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| E-Cores | 12 | 8 |
| E-Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.6 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Total Cores | 16 | 12 |
| Total Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20x | 20x |
| L1 Cache | 192K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2560K (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 18MB (shared) | 24MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 2 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 15-25 W (configurable) | 15-54 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 80 W | - |
| Socket | FCBGA2540 | FP8 |
| Peak Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Laptop processors ranking (48th and 38th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Arc B390 | AMD Radeon 890M |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2500 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64 |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 12 | 16 |
| TGP | 30 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 890M compared to Arc B390
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5X-9600 | - DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Max. Memory Size | 96 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | - |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H official page | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 16 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 3