Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra X7 368H or Core Ultra 7 366H: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Ultra 7 366H

70 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
VS
67 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Core Ultra X7 368H against the 2.0 GHz Ultra 7 366H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 366H and 368H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
  • More powerful Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics: 7.7 vs 2.6 TFLOPS
  • Around 38.4 GB/s (33%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5X-8533 RAM

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra X7 368H
vs
Core Ultra 7 366H

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (92nd and 118th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1450 MB/sec 1330 MB/sec
Clang compilation 131.5 Klines/sec 122.4 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 459.5 pages/sec 435.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 512.1 Mpixels/sec 507.4 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 301.9 pages/sec 285.5 pages/sec
Background blur 71 images/sec 70.7 images/sec
Photo processing 177.8 images/sec 174.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 27.9 Mpixels/sec 26.9 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 87.6 GOps/sec 83.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 105.8 GOps/sec 104 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 325M Primes/sec 328M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 38.7M Strings/sec 40.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 25.5 GBytes/sec 26.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 317.4 MBytes/sec 331.2 MBytes/sec
Physics 2893 Frames/sec 2892 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.2B Matrices/sec 27.3B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 99 & 270 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 52.1 PPW 46.3 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 646.9 PPW 661.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1328.8 PPW 1348 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.91 PPW 7.94 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Ultra 7 366H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Panther Lake
Model number 368H 366H
Integrated GPU Arc B390 Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360
Intel CPU rating (41st and 54th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 4 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 12
E-Threads 12 12
Base Frequency (E) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz 3.6 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 16 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 20x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 2560K (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 2 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 15-25 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W 80 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA2540
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Laptop processors ranking (49th and 66th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc B390 Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 1536 512
TMUs 48 32
ROPs 24 16
Execution Units 12 4
TGP 30 W 25 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra X7 368H +196%
7.7 TFLOPS
Core Ultra 7 366H
2.6 TFLOPS
More info: Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) compared to Arc B390

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600 - LPDDR5X-8533
- DDR5-7200
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 115.2 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra X7 368H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 366H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core 7 240H
2. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360
3. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
4. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
5. Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
6. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
7. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
8. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
9. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core i7 14650HX
10. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Apple M5 (10-Core) (1)
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H or Ultra X7 368H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский