Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra X9 378H or Core Ultra X7 368H: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs Ultra X7 368H

75 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
VS
70 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2 GHz Intel Core Ultra X9 378H against the 2 GHz Ultra X7 368H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 368H and 378H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
  • Newer - released 5 months later

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra X9 378H
vs
Core Ultra X7 368H

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 535 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 5201 -
Cinebench Scores (#24th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression - 1450 MB/sec
Clang compilation - 131.5 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 459.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 512.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing - 301.9 pages/sec
Background blur - 71 images/sec
Photo processing - 177.8 images/sec
Ray tracing - 27.9 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 92.6 GOps/sec 87.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 114.5 GOps/sec 105.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 357M Primes/sec 325M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 44.6M Strings/sec 38.7M Strings/sec
Data encryption 29.8 GBytes/sec 25.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 386.6 MBytes/sec 317.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 3404 Frames/sec 2893 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 31.3B Matrices/sec 26.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 1 & 99 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 52.8 PPW 52.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 659.8 PPW 646.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1531.9 PPW 1328.8 PPW
Blender / Watt - 7.91 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and Ultra X7 368H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released May 13, 2026 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Panther Lake
Model number 388H 368H
Integrated GPU Arc B390 Arc B390
Intel CPU rating (27th and 42nd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 4 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5 GHz 5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 12
E-Threads 12 12
Base Frequency (E) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 16 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 20x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2560K (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 2 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 15-25 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W 80 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCBGA2540
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Laptop processors ranking (31st and 51st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc B390 Intel Arc B390
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1536
TMUs 48 48
ROPs 24 24
Execution Units 12 12
TGP 30 W 30 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra X9 378H
7.7 TFLOPS
Core Ultra X7 368H
7.7 TFLOPS
See: Intel Arc B390 benchmarks

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600 - LPDDR5X-9600
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 153.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra X9 378H official page Intel Core Ultra X7 368H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 12

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (1)
2. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
3. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
4. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
5. Intel Core Ultra X7 368H vs Apple M5 (10-Core) (1)
6. Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
7. Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
8. Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
9. Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
10. Intel Core Ultra X9 378H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H or Ultra X9 378H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский