Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) with 12-cores against the 4.0 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
- Has 4 more physical cores
- Newer - released 10 months later
- 17% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2880 vs 2469 points
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
- 24% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (105th and 172nd place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1150 MB/sec | 962.5 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 144.9 Klines/sec | 101.4 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 338.7 pages/sec | 211.8 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 416.5 Mpixels/sec | 326.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 268.6 pages/sec | 260.3 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 67.7 images/sec | 53.8 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 117.6 images/sec | 87.4 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 25 Mpixels/sec | 22.5 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 71.9 GOps/sec | 102.1 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 106.9 GOps/sec | 62.3 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 301M Primes/sec | 90M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 34M Strings/sec | 42.5M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 16.2 GBytes/sec | 21.5 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 219.6 MBytes/sec | 360.4 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 1748 Frames/sec | 1427 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 16.4B Matrices/sec | 27.2B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 34.9 PPW | 17.3 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 434.6 PPW | 215.4 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 708.8 PPW | 551.5 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | - | 4.18 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-10-24 (Eggburt) | Cinebench 2024 | 127 / 794 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-11-09 (chrisg) | Cinebench 2024 | 105 / 873 |
| π 2025-08-19 (Phillywilly2000) | Cinebench 2024 | 102 / 906 |
| π 2025-07-14 (GlancingOcean) | Cinebench 2024 | 70 / 677 |
| π 2025-05-13 (antoooooo) | Cinebench 2024 | 109 / 1009 |
| π 2025-03-08 (ζ²§ζ΅·) | GeekBench | 2614 / 12911 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) and AMD Ryzen 9 7940HSGeneral
| Vendor | Qualcomm | Amd |
| Released | October 24, 2023 | January 4, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Snapdragon X | Zen 4 (Phoenix) |
| Model number | X1E-84-100 | - |
| Integrated GPU | Qualcomm Adreno X1 | Radeon 780M |
| Rival Equivalent | - Apple M3 Pro | - Intel Core i9 13900H |
| Successor | - | - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 |
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#66th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 12 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 3.8 GHz | 4.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 4.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Total Cores | 12 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | - | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 38x | 40x |
| L1 Cache | - | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | - | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Transistors | - | 25 billions |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 35 W | 35-54 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 80 W | - |
| Socket | Custom | FP8 |
| Peak Temperature | - | 100Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (52nd and 105th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno X1 | Radeon 780M |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 768 |
| TMUs | 96 | 48 |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 6 | 12 |
| TGP | 30 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 780M compared to Adreno X1-85
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5x-8448 | - DDR5-5600 - LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max. Memory Size | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels | 8 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | - |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) official page | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS official page |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 20 |
Further details
Notes on Ryzen 9 7940HS:
- DDR5 memory is supported only on the FP7r2 socket, while FP7 and FP8 sockets support LPDDR5/x.
- ECC support is available exclusively on the FP7r2 socket.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 173