Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) vs Max GPU (32-core)

We compared two integrated laptop professional GPUs: the Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) with 256 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the Max GPU (32-core) that utilizes 512 pipelines and 4096 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M5 Max GPU (32-core) over M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 Max GPU (32-core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 78%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (13.3 vs 6.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 65% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (124K vs 75K)
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 460.8 vs 307 GB/s
  • Has 2x more shading units (4096 vs 2048)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Solar Bay 39369 69788
Wild Life Extreme 19874 35786
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 153.3 img/sec 234.8 img/sec
Face Detection 101 img/sec 158.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.82 Gpixels/sec 4.48 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.09 Gpixels/sec 6.62 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.69 Gpixels/sec 7.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.84 Gpixels/sec 1.17 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 212.6 Gpixels/sec 384.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 9757.6 FPS 17866.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 51 & 37 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-18 (JSK)Steel Nomad Light8894
📘 2026-03-30 (JSK)Geekbench 6 OpenCL76085
Apple M5 Max GPU (32-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 8260 10338
Image Segmentation (HP) 25244 42053
Image Super Resolution (Q) 33177 41729
Face Detection (HP) 51773 71929
Pose Estimation (Q) 190718 287035
Text Classification (SP) 2913 2958
Machine Translation (HP) 8985 9156
Object Detection (SP) 7777 9951
Depth Estimation (Q) 63837 82338
Style Transfer (SP) 128419 264780
Framework Core ML Core ML
Backend GPU GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M5 Pro GPU (16-core) and Max GPU (32-core)

General

Vendor Apple Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released March 3, 2026 March 3, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Apple M GPU Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Custom Custom
Recommended CPU - Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) or above - Apple M5 Max (32-сore GPU) or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M5 Pro (15-Core) - Apple M5 Max (32-сore GPU)
Laptop GPU ranking (24th and 9th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Boost Clock 1620 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units 2048 4096
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 128 256
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 128
Compute Units (Pipelines) 256 512
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 104 GPixel/s 207 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 207 GTexel/s 415 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
13.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom Custom
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
Transistor Count 28 billion 28 billion
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 9600 MHz 9600 MHz
Bus 256-bit 384-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s

API

Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!