GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop vs GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

We compared two discrete laptop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 2 years and 11 months older GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GTX 1650 Ti Laptop over RTX 4050 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.3x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 4x higher maximum theoretical performance (12.1 vs 3 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 2.3x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 53 vs 23 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 20 dedicated RT cores

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
107
66
56
35
56
33
26
16
The Witcher 3
117
91
67
34
45
33
23
11
Counter-Strike 2
167
126
88
43
77
55
36
14
Far Cry 6
87
79
59
32
43
42
31
14
Hogwarts Legacy
62
52
34
20
27
20
15
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
75
68
44
30
35
30
20
12
Ghost of Tsushima
57
45
33
17
25
18
13
-
Cyberpunk 2077
61
57
34
13
26
24
14
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
90
62
32
47
45
28
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 92 42
1080p Ultra 75 33
1440p Ultra 53 23
4K Ultra 28 11
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8212 3674
Solar Bay 35375 -
Port Royal 4624 -
Fire Strike 21909 10076
Wild Life Extreme 15492 7553
Night Raid 84848 42727
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 141.4 img/sec 83.5 img/sec
Face Detection 84.1 img/sec 45.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.07 Gpixels/sec 1.77 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.91 Gpixels/sec 2.32 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 3.85 Gpixels/sec 2.28 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.1 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 325.9 Gpixels/sec 204.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 11008.8 FPS 5954.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 622 370
DirectX 11 129 FPS 61 FPS
DirectX 12 60 FPS 33 FPS
GPU Compute 5847 Ops/s 2717 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 14311 & 6030 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2567.25
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 2120 & 37 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)Geekbench 6 OpenCL93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)Geekbench 6 OpenCL90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekbench 6 OpenCL89343
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6233 2866
Image Segmentation (HP) 16395 3745
Image Super Resolution (Q) 18240 6865
Face Detection (HP) 30758 6519
Pose Estimation (Q) 61300 24706
Text Classification (SP) 3124 1793
Machine Translation (HP) 4357 1906
Object Detection (SP) 7812 3498
Depth Estimation (Q) 29192 13936
Style Transfer (SP) 117759 50917
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released February 22, 2023 April 2, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Turing
GPU Codename AD107 (GN21-X2) TU117 (N18P-G62)
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 7700S - Radeon RX 5500M
Successor - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above - Intel Core i5 10300H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (67th and 109th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1140-2070 MHz (configurable) 1350 MHz
Boost Clock 1605-2370 MHz (configurable) 1485 MHz
Shading Units 2560 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 16
Tensor Cores 80 No
Ray-tracing Cores 20 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 12MB shared 1MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 51-76 GPixel/s 48 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 128-190 GTexel/s 95 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 50 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 12 nm
Die Size 156 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 4.7 billion
Transistor Density 121.15 MTr/mm² 23.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 12000 Mbps
Bus 96-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
CUDA 8.9 7.5
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
13 (92.9%)
1 (7.1%)
Total votes: 14

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!