GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12 GB with 60 pipelines and 7680 shaders against the 10 months newer Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) that utilizes 640 pipelines and 5120 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M3 Max GPU (40-core) over RTX 4070 Ti
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
  • Performs significantly better (up to 90%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.8x higher maximum theoretical performance (40.1 vs 14.1 TFLOPS)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Achieves 2.3x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (219K vs 94K)
  • Has 23% higher memory bandwidth: 504 vs 409.6 GB/s
  • Has 50% more shading units (7680 vs 5120)
Reasons to consider the Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
197
136
126
100
-
The Witcher 3
211
190
135
72
-
Counter-Strike 2
288
218
160
83
-
Far Cry 6
164
147
130
81
-
Hogwarts Legacy
140
115
89
50
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
181
172
134
90
-
Ghost of Tsushima
124
107
92
55
-
Cyberpunk 2077
161
147
98
44
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
257
243
188
98
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 191 -
1080p Ultra 164 -
1440p Ultra 128 -
4K Ultra 75 -
Margin of Error Low Medium

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 22743 -
Solar Bay 108437 49656
Port Royal 13995 -
Fire Strike 53473 -
Wild Life Extreme 45396 30893
Night Raid 171208 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RTX 4070 Ti +132%
219163
Background Blur 371.2 img/sec 157.6 img/sec
Face Detection 235 img/sec 100.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 7.51 Gpixels/sec 3.99 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 10.6 Gpixels/sec 6.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 12.4 Gpixels/sec 5 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 2.03 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 1120 Gpixels/sec 363.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 30420.2 FPS 12226.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 1209 -
DirectX 11 287 FPS -
DirectX 12 115 FPS -
GPU Compute 18136 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 15445 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
6634.23
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 2660 & 446 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-14 (Isa)Cinebench 202480717
📘 2026-06-02 (Harley)Cinebench 202479993
📘 2026-03-27 (minato)Cinebench 202480470
Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
RTX 4070 Ti +119%
48989
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 12496 8685
Image Segmentation (HP) 33378 20739
Image Super Resolution (Q) 37180 22775
Face Detection (HP) 62919 37676
Pose Estimation (Q) 171125 91609
Text Classification (SP) 3630 2909
Machine Translation (HP) 6420 5274
Object Detection (SP) 15804 7480
Depth Estimation (Q) 58647 38212
Style Transfer (SP) 331379 190681
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released January 3, 2023 October 31, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $799 -
Case Desktop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Professional
Segment Mid-range High-end
Architecture Ada Lovelace Apple M GPU
GPU Codename AD104 -
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX 7900 XT - GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
Successor - GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 14700K or above - Apple M3 Max or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M3 Max
Desktop GPU rating (#15th place)
Laptop GPU ranking (#21st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 2310 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 2610 MHz 1380 MHz
Shading Units 7680 5120
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 240 320
Render Output Units (ROPs) 80 160
Compute Units (Pipelines) 60 640
Tensor Cores 240 -
Ray-tracing Cores 60 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 48MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 209 GPixel/s 221 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 626 GTexel/s 442 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 4070 Ti +184%
40.1 TFLOPS
14.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 285 W 60 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 3 nm
Die Size 294 mm² -
Transistor Count 35 billion 56 billion
Transistor Density 119.05 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6X System Shared
Memory Size 12 GB -
Memory Clock 1313 MHz 6400 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 21000 Mbps 12800 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 512-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 3.0 -
CUDA 8.9 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
29 (59.2%)
20 (40.8%)
Total votes: 49

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!