Intel Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050
VS
Intel Arc A750
DG2-512
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
GA106
We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Intel Arc A750 with 3584 shaders against the 1 year and 9 months older GeForce RTX 3050 that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Performs significantly better (up to 71%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 89% higher maximum theoretical performance (17.2 vs 9.1 TFLOPS)
- Shows 40% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 59 vs 42 FPS
- Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
- Features 368 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
- Has 2.3x higher memory bandwidth: 512 vs 224 GB/s
- Achieves 48% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (99K vs 67K)
- Has 40% more shading units (3584 vs 2560)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050
- Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 113 68 57 43 |
92 53 43 26 |
| The Witcher 3 | 130 114 81 41 |
90 70 49 24 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 149 108 78 40 |
139 101 72 31 |
| Far Cry 6 | 97 87 68 35 |
76 66 49 25 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 63 50 40 23 |
49 38 30 13 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 71 69 47 27 |
59 49 35 22 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 67 51 41 20 |
46 35 28 15 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 78 69 47 22 |
48 45 26 11 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 110 98 72 42 |
80 73 49 25 |
| 1080p High | 98 | 75 |
| 1080p Ultra | 79 | 59 |
| 1440p Ultra | 59 | 42 |
| 4K Ultra | 33 | 21 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 12423 | 6235 |
| Solar Bay | 45821 | 30191 |
| Port Royal | 6594 | 3546 |
| Fire Strike | 30403 | 15967 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 23688 | 12795 |
| Night Raid | 110746 | 74854 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 145.2 img/sec | 110.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 82 img/sec | 64.4 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.35 Gpixels/sec | 2.87 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.01 Gpixels/sec | 3.76 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.59 Gpixels/sec | 2.89 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.81 Gpixels/sec | 0.81 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 462.4 Gpixels/sec | 270.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 18623.1 FPS | 9339.7 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 738 | 916 |
| DirectX 11 | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 70 FPS | 59 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 5297 Ops/s | 6415 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
Intel Arc A750
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 3050
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Cinebench 2024 | 4722 |
| 📘 2026-04-21 -> DmitryDmitry | Steel Nomad Light | 6237 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 5475 | 4958 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 13781 | 12747 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 11612 | 9816 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 18556 | 22467 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 58801 | 41362 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 824 | 2563 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 2397 | 3721 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 6895 | 5929 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 22219 | 18361 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 161148 | 84665 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Intel Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3050General
| Vendor | Intel | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | October 12, 2023 | January 27, 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | $249 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| GPU Codename | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Rival Equivalent | - GeForce RTX 3050 | - |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i5 12500 or above | - Intel Core i5 12400 or above |
Desktop GPU rating (59th and 71st place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 2050 MHz | 1552 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 224 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 112 | 32 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | - | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 448 | 80 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 28 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | - | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 16MB shared | 2MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 269 GPixel/s | 57 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 538 GTexel/s | 142 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 225 W | 130 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Fabrication Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Die Size | 406 mm² | 276 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 21 billion | 12 billion |
| Transistor Density | 51.72 MTr/mm² | 43.48 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 16000 Mbps | 14000 Mbps |
| Bus | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | DLSS 2 |
| DisplayPort | 2.0 | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 30