Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) vs Graphics (4-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the Graphics (4-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) over Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (2.6 vs 1.3 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.1x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (23K vs 11K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (512 vs 256)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur - 57.6 img/sec
Face Detection - 29.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection - 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection - 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur - 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching - 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching - 61.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics - 3352.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) - 4265
Image Segmentation (HP) - 11549
Image Super Resolution (Q) - 4466
Face Detection (HP) - 16012
Pose Estimation (Q) - 8425
Text Classification (SP) - 1380
Machine Translation (HP) - 4037
Object Detection (SP) - 4026
Depth Estimation (Q) - 10708
Style Transfer (SP) - 35823
Framework - ONNX
Backend - DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) and Graphics (4-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 5, 2026 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Celestial Celestial
GPU Codename Panther Lake Panther Lake
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 332 or above - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 5 315
- Intel Core 7 350
- Intel Core 5 320
- Intel Core Ultra 5 332
- Intel Core Ultra 5 322
- Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
Laptop GPU ranking (81st and 75th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2500 MHz
Shading Units 256 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 4
Tensor Cores 32 32
Ray-tracing Cores 2 4
L1 Cache 64KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 4MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 20 GPixel/s 40 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 40 GTexel/s 80 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 PCIe 5.0
TGP 25 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12.1 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
5 (100%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!