AMD Radeon 780M vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 780M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 3 years and 1 month newer Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) over Radeon 780M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 780M
  • 65% higher maximum theoretical performance (4.3 vs 2.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 41% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (32K vs 23K)
  • Has 50% more shading units (768 vs 512)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
52
26
22
11
-
The Witcher 3
26
26
13
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
44
31
21
9
-
Far Cry 6
39
29
21
10
-
Hogwarts Legacy
22
15
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
34
29
19
12
-
Ghost of Tsushima
21
15
10
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
20
10
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
36
31
20
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 33 -
1080p Ultra 25 -
1440p Ultra 16 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2787 -
Solar Bay 11525 -
Port Royal 1579 -
Fire Strike 7885 -
Wild Life Extreme 5305 -
Night Raid 33367 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 86.4 img/sec 57.6 img/sec
Face Detection 35.8 img/sec 29.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.36 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.41 Gpixels/sec 1.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 132.4 Gpixels/sec 61.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4470.7 FPS 3352.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 885 -
DirectX 11 65 FPS -
DirectX 12 30 FPS -
GPU Compute 3577 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 12072 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 182 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 780M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL27852
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 OpenCL23850
📘 2026-10-01 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 OpenCL28775
📘 2026-08-17 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL32197
📘 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 OpenCL28558
Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 3860 4265
Image Segmentation (HP) 5435 11549
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10580 4466
Face Detection (HP) 12855 16012
Pose Estimation (Q) 34716 8425
Text Classification (SP) 2578 1380
Machine Translation (HP) 3897 4037
Object Detection (SP) 3078 4026
Depth Estimation (Q) 14989 10708
Style Transfer (SP) 78608 35823
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 780M and Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Celestial
GPU Codename Phoenix Panther Lake
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores) -
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 7840U or above - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
- AMD Ryzen 7 260
- AMD Ryzen 9 270
- AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- and 6 more
- Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
Laptop GPU ranking (99th and 76th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2700-2800 MHz (configurable) 2500 MHz
Shading Units 768 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 4
Tensor Cores - 32
Ray-tracing Cores 12 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 86-90 GPixel/s 40 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 130-134 GTexel/s 80 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 5.0
TGP 15 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 178 mm² -
Transistor Count 25.4 billion -
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC - No

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.3 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
3 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!