AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 680M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 2 years newer Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) that utilizes 64 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc iGPU (4-Cores) over Radeon 680M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • 85% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.7 vs 2 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 76% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (28K vs 16K)
  • Has 50% more shading units (768 vs 512)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2327 -
Solar Bay 9712 -
Port Royal 1008 -
Fire Strike 6903 -
Wild Life Extreme 4163 -
Night Raid 27534 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
28675
Background Blur 73.8 img/sec 37.6 img/sec
Face Detection 30.1 img/sec 17.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.93 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.17 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.17 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 105 Gpixels/sec 60 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4640 FPS 3695.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 723 -
DirectX 11 40 FPS -
DirectX 12 21 FPS -
GPU Compute 2006 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5]176 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9]12 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)GeekBench26880
Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1976 2902
Image Segmentation (HP) 3138 5473
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6693 2967
Face Detection (HP) 7213 6068
Pose Estimation (Q) 21849 8220
Text Classification (SP) 1497 609
Machine Translation (HP) 2579 1146
Object Detection (SP) 2154 2766
Depth Estimation (Q) 9635 6405
Style Transfer (SP) 56269 26796
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 680M and Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 1, 2022 December 14, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Xe LPG
GPU Codename Rembrandt -
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX Vega 8 - Radeon 740M
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 125U or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
- Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
- and 12 more
Laptop GPU ranking (102nd and 96th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2200-2400 MHz (configurable) 1750-2000 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 64
Ray-tracing Cores 12 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 768KB shared
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70-77 GPixel/s 28-32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 106-115 GTexel/s 56-64 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS
1.8-2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 14 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 5 nm
Die Size 208 mm² -
Transistor Count 13.1 billion -
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
4 (44.4%)
5 (55.6%)
Total votes: 9

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!