Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada) vs GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop

We compared two discrete laptop graphics cards: the Nvidia RTX 2000 Mobile (Ada) with 24 pipelines and 3072 shaders against the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile that utilizes 24 pipelines and 3072 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4060 Mobile over RTX 2000 Mobile (Ada)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
  • Performs better (up to 22%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 29% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 67 vs 52 FPS
  • Achieves 20% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (97K vs 81K)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
103
63
52
35
120
77
66
44
The Witcher 3
111
93
66
35
141
112
79
42
Counter-Strike 2
168
123
86
40
205
153
110
54
Far Cry 6
86
79
59
33
103
92
75
43
Hogwarts Legacy
61
48
36
19
74
62
45
25
CoD: Modern Warfare III
74
66
45
30
95
85
59
37
Ghost of Tsushima
56
43
31
20
74
60
42
23
Cyberpunk 2077
63
53
33
12
82
72
42
21
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
97
90
61
31
127
116
83
43
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 91 113
1080p Ultra 73 92
1440p Ultra 52 67
4K Ultra 28 37
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 7446 10397
Solar Bay 30392 45002
Port Royal 4537 5819
Fire Strike 18845 26481
Wild Life Extreme 14651 19820
Night Raid 76011 98330
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 149.7 img/sec 142.7 img/sec
Face Detection 88.5 img/sec 103.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.24 Gpixels/sec 3.83 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.3 Gpixels/sec 4.93 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.3 Gpixels/sec 4.63 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.06 Gpixels/sec 1.27 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 278.2 Gpixels/sec 430.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 9706.8 FPS 13519.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 600 731
DirectX 11 123 FPS 155 FPS
DirectX 12 66 FPS 72 FPS
GPU Compute 5624 Ops/s 6789 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2156 & 22366 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
3293.54
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 146 & 4321 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada)
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-04 (Viru)Geekbench 6 OpenCL115610
📘 2026-09-04 (Viru)Cinebench 202410216
📘 2026-02-21 (Бенкдикт)Geekbench 6 OpenCL101184
📘 2025-12-18 (AmirtheX)Geekbench 6 OpenCL107583
📘 2025-11-17 (kritan)Cinebench 202410306

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6324 7421
Image Segmentation (HP) 13952 19041
Image Super Resolution (Q) 19043 20913
Face Detection (HP) 28439 35464
Pose Estimation (Q) 69947 67110
Text Classification (SP) 2887 3086
Machine Translation (HP) 3267 4740
Object Detection (SP) 7742 8644
Depth Estimation (Q) 29911 32456
Style Transfer (SP) 131880 142039
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada) and GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 21, 2023 February 22, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename AD107 AD107 (GN21-X4)
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (58th and 43rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock - 1140-2295 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 1245-2360 MHz (configurable) 1470-2370 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 3072 3072
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 96 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 48 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 24 24
Tensor Cores 96 96
Ray-tracing Cores 24 24
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 32MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 60-113 GPixel/s 71-114 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 120-227 GTexel/s 141-228 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
7.6-14.5 TFLOPS
9-14.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 159 mm² 156 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 18.9 billion
Transistor Density 118.87 MTr/mm² 121.15 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 95°C -

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
4 (50%)
4 (50%)
Total votes: 8

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Salman July 31, 2026 at 03:02 PM
1 is consumer GPU, and the other one is professional, and both are made for difference purposes. Geforce might be better in gaming but Quadro is better for CAD, and also ISV certified. So Please mention these perspectives in your comparison.
0 Reply