Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada) vs 1000 Laptop (Ada)

We compared two discrete laptop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX 2000 Mobile (Ada) 8 GB with 24 pipelines and 3072 shaders against the 1 year newer 1000 Mobile (Ada) 6 GB that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 1000 Mobile (Ada) over RTX 2000 Mobile (Ada)
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada)
  • 20% higher maximum theoretical performance (14.5 vs 12.1 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 2 GB more video memory
  • Has 33% higher memory bandwidth: 256 vs 192 GB/s

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
103
63
52
35
-
The Witcher 3
111
93
66
35
-
Counter-Strike 2
168
123
86
40
-
Far Cry 6
86
79
59
33
-
Hogwarts Legacy
61
48
36
19
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
74
66
45
30
-
Ghost of Tsushima
56
43
31
20
-
Cyberpunk 2077
63
53
33
12
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
97
90
61
31
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 91 -
1080p Ultra 73 -
1440p Ultra 52 -
4K Ultra 28 -
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 7446 -
Solar Bay 30392 -
Port Royal 4537 -
Fire Strike 18845 -
Wild Life Extreme 14651 -
Night Raid 76011 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 149.7 img/sec 123.8 img/sec
Face Detection 88.5 img/sec 74.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.24 Gpixels/sec 2.88 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.3 Gpixels/sec 3.76 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.3 Gpixels/sec 3.68 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.06 Gpixels/sec 0.97 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 278.2 Gpixels/sec 290 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 9706.8 FPS 9455.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 600 562
DirectX 11 123 FPS 110 FPS
DirectX 12 66 FPS 63 FPS
GPU Compute 5624 Ops/s 5295 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]2156 & 687 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10]146 & 29 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6324 5554
Image Segmentation (HP) 13952 11873
Image Super Resolution (Q) 19043 15799
Face Detection (HP) 28439 25103
Pose Estimation (Q) 69947 51054
Text Classification (SP) 2887 2761
Machine Translation (HP) 3267 3137
Object Detection (SP) 7742 6750
Depth Estimation (Q) 29911 24450
Style Transfer (SP) 131880 101447
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada) and 1000 Laptop (Ada)

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 21, 2023 February 26, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename AD107 AD107
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (57th and 47th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Boost Clock 1245-2360 MHz (configurable) 1245-2360 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 3072 2560
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 96 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 48 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 24 20
Tensor Cores 96 80
Ray-tracing Cores 24 20
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 32MB shared 12MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 60-113 GPixel/s 60-113 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 120-227 GTexel/s 100-189 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
7.6-14.5 TFLOPS
6.4-12.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 159 mm² 159 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 18.9 billion
Transistor Density 118.87 MTr/mm² 118.87 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 95°C 95°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 96-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
7 (63.6%)
4 (36.4%)
Total votes: 11

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!