Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada vs 4500 Ada

We compared two discrete desktop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada 48 GB with 142 pipelines and 18176 shaders against the 8 months newer 4500 Ada 24 GB that utilizes 60 pipelines and 7680 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
48 GB GDDR6
VS
24 GB GDDR6
4.7
(Bad)
Value Index
12.9
(Bad)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4500 Ada over RTX 6000 Ada
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
  • Performs significantly better (up to 50%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.3x higher maximum theoretical performance (91.1 vs 39.6 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 26% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 149 vs 118 FPS
  • Includes 24 GB more video memory
  • Features 328 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Has 2.2x higher memory bandwidth: 960 vs 432 GB/s
  • Achieves 89% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (389K vs 206K)
  • Has 2.4x more shading units (18176 vs 7680)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
231
168
153
125
188
125
115
89
The Witcher 3
246
212
152
80
201
170
128
66
Counter-Strike 2
313
219
173
83
274
213
151
83
Far Cry 6
175
160
148
91
158
139
126
78
Hogwarts Legacy
164
137
108
60
132
108
85
45
CoD: Modern Warfare III
220
214
174
116
170
159
122
80
Ghost of Tsushima
148
124
110
68
116
97
84
49
Cyberpunk 2077
196
172
123
58
148
132
86
43
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
287
267
201
109
237
219
169
91
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 220 180
1080p Ultra 186 151
1440p Ultra 149 118
4K Ultra 88 69
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
32284
21566
Time Spy 26529 19814
Solar Bay 145429 85186
Port Royal 19497 12733
Fire Strike 62803 48036
Wild Life Extreme 53640 40308
Night Raid 148225 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
389848
206673
Background Blur 618.3 img/sec 309.9 img/sec
Face Detection 399.9 img/sec 198.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 15.1 Gpixels/sec 7.42 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 22.1 Gpixels/sec 9.94 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 26.3 Gpixels/sec 12.4 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 2.33 Gpixels/sec 2.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 2210 Gpixels/sec 1060 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 53494.5 FPS 31078.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU
32515
19967

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
28683
28026
G2D Mark 1007 1161
DirectX 11 284 FPS 259 FPS
DirectX 12 101 FPS 90 FPS
GPU Compute 22506 Ops/s 16769 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 276 & 169 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
11087.8
5583.37
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 113 & 23 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
37270
26396
GB6 ML Half Precision
53469
40553
GB6 ML Quantized
27850
20133
Image Classification (SP) 13367 11193
Image Segmentation (HP) 32477 20124
Image Super Resolution (Q) 42056 34904
Face Detection (HP) 69004 42820
Pose Estimation (Q) 230965 149991
Text Classification (SP) 3491 3789
Machine Translation (HP) 5545 4268
Object Detection (SP) 18668 13068
Depth Estimation (Q) 68370 47003
Style Transfer (SP) 520389 300643
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada and 4500 Ada

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released December 3, 2022 August 23, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $6800 $2250
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename AD102 AD103
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i9 14900K or above - Intel Core i7 14700K or above
Desktop GPU rating (5th and 17th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 915 MHz 2070 MHz
Boost Clock 2505 MHz 2580 MHz
Shading Units 18176 7680
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 568 240
Render Output Units (ROPs) 192 80
Compute Units (Pipelines) 142 60
Tensor Cores 568 240
Ray-tracing Cores 142 60
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 96MB shared 48MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 481 GPixel/s 206 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 1423 GTexel/s 619 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 6000 Ada +130%
91.1 TFLOPS
39.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 300 W 210 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 609 mm² 379 mm²
Transistor Count 76 billion 45 billion
Transistor Density 124.79 MTr/mm² 118.73 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 48 GB 24 GB
Memory Clock 2500 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 20000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 384-bit 192-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
RTX 6000 Ada +122%
960 GB/s
432 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!