Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell vs 6000 Ada

We compared two discrete desktop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell 96 GB with 188 pipelines and 24064 shaders against the 3 years and 4 months older 6000 Ada 48 GB that utilizes 142 pipelines and 18176 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
96 GB GDDR7
VS
48 GB GDDR6
4.5
(Bad)
Value Index
4.7
(Bad)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 6000 Ada over RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell
  • Performs significantly better (up to 55%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 32% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 196 vs 149 FPS
  • 38% higher maximum theoretical performance (126 vs 91.1 TFLOPS)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
309
235
215
175
231
168
153
125
The Witcher 3
343
311
216
116
246
212
152
80
Counter-Strike 2
362
263
203
93
313
219
173
83
Far Cry 6
221
198
185
112
175
160
148
91
Hogwarts Legacy
235
189
150
89
164
137
108
60
CoD: Modern Warfare III
305
296
252
176
220
214
174
116
Ghost of Tsushima
206
170
158
107
148
124
110
68
Cyberpunk 2077
253
221
160
71
196
172
123
58
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
319
298
224
121
287
267
201
109
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 284 220
1080p Ultra 242 186
1440p Ultra 196 149
4K Ultra 118 88
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 42614 26529
Solar Bay 255911 145429
Port Royal 39888 19497
Fire Strike 75325 62803
Wild Life Extreme 110070 53640
Night Raid 214655 148225
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 366.1 img/sec 618.3 img/sec
Face Detection 248 img/sec 399.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 23.3 Gpixels/sec 15.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 35.2 Gpixels/sec 22.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 45 Gpixels/sec 26.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 2.47 Gpixels/sec 2.33 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 3040 Gpixels/sec 2210 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 42574.6 FPS 53494.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 1391 1008
DirectX 11 339 FPS 284 FPS
DirectX 12 154 FPS 102 FPS
GPU Compute 26607 Ops/s 22495 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]264 & 273 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
16759.84
11087.8
Sources: Blender [9], [10]280 & 113 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 16903 13367
Image Segmentation (HP) 48518 32477
Image Super Resolution (Q) 54618 42056
Face Detection (HP) 103224 69004
Pose Estimation (Q) 338587 230965
Text Classification (SP) 3894 3491
Machine Translation (HP) 7291 5545
Object Detection (SP) 26498 18668
Depth Estimation (Q) 90853 68370
Style Transfer (SP) 635289 520389
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell and 6000 Ada

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 18, 2026 December 3, 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $8559 $6800
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture Blackwell 2.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GB202-300-A1 AD102
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D or above - Intel Core i9 14900K or above
Desktop GPU rating (1st and 5th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1590 MHz 915 MHz
Boost Clock 2617 MHz 2505 MHz
Shading Units 24064 18176
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 752 568
Render Output Units (ROPs) 190 192
Compute Units (Pipelines) 188 142
Tensor Cores 752 568
Ray-tracing Cores 188 142
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 128MB shared 96MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 497 GPixel/s 481 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 1968 GTexel/s 1423 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
126 TFLOPS
91.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 600 W 300 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 750 mm² 609 mm²
Transistor Count 92.2 billion 76 billion
Transistor Density 122.93 MTr/mm² 124.79 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory Size 96 GB 48 GB
Memory Clock 1750 MHz 2500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 28000 Mbps 20000 Mbps
Bus 512-bit 384-bit
ECC Yes No
Memory Bandwidth
1792 GB/s
960 GB/s

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 12 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 4 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1b 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
14 (87.5%)
2 (12.5%)
Total votes: 16

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!