AMD Radeon 840M vs Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 840M with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 1 year and 1 month older Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) that utilizes 64 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc iGPU (4-Cores) over Radeon 840M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 840M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
  • 33% higher maximum theoretical performance (2 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Has 2x more shading units (512 vs 256)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
14
12
-
-
The Witcher 3
11
12
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
27
20
14
-
-
Far Cry 6
21
17
12
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
19
14
9
-
Ghost of Tsushima
13
10
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
10
10
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
18
11
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 -
1080p Ultra 14 -
1440p Ultra 10 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1699 -
Solar Bay 6960 -
Port Royal 553 -
Fire Strike 5303 -
Wild Life Extreme 2671 -
Night Raid 22563 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
14025
16321
Background Blur 31.8 img/sec 37.6 img/sec
Face Detection 16.8 img/sec 17.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 52.5 Gpixels/sec 60 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2048.6 FPS 3695.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 870 -
DirectX 11 32 FPS -
DirectX 12 17 FPS -
GPU Compute 1697 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 1020 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 12 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1988 2902
Image Segmentation (HP) 2184 5473
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4788 2967
Face Detection (HP) 6857 6068
Pose Estimation (Q) 17396 8220
Text Classification (SP) 1628 609
Machine Translation (HP) 2053 1146
Object Detection (SP) 1825 2766
Depth Estimation (Q) 8471 6405
Style Transfer (SP) 31032 26796
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 840M and Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 December 14, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Xe LPG
GPU Codename Krackan Point -
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 130T - Radeon 740M
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 125U or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
- Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225U
- Intel Core Ultra 5 235U
- Intel Core Ultra 7 255U
- and 12 more
Laptop GPU ranking (108th and 98th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 1750-2000 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 256 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 64
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores 4 4
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 768KB shared
L2 Cache 1MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 GPixel/s 28-32 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTexel/s 56-64 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.5 TFLOPS
1.8-2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 14 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 195 mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
6 (66.7%)
3 (33.3%)
Total votes: 9

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!