AMD Radeon 890M vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Radeon 890M with 16 pipelines and 1024 shaders against the 2 years and 6 months older GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 2050 Laptop over Radeon 890M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 890M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
  • Performs better (up to 25%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Shows 32% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 25 vs 19 FPS
  • Has 2x more shading units (2048 vs 1024)
  • Features 64 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
57
30
25
14
66
38
28
18
The Witcher 3
36
32
18
-
49
40
24
14
Counter-Strike 2
51
34
25
10
87
61
41
17
Far Cry 6
43
37
23
13
48
45
34
15
Hogwarts Legacy
25
17
14
-
29
22
17
9
CoD: Modern Warfare III
39
34
22
14
37
32
21
15
Ghost of Tsushima
25
17
12
-
27
20
15
9
Cyberpunk 2077
23
23
12
-
28
24
14
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
43
34
21
10
51
50
31
15
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 38 47
1080p Ultra 29 37
1440p Ultra 19 25
4K Ultra 10 13
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3967
Time Spy 3305 3932
Solar Bay 15412 19073
Port Royal 1795 413
Fire Strike 8908 10472
Wild Life Extreme 6884 7222
Night Raid 37640 45365
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 98.6 img/sec 73.3 img/sec
Face Detection 42 img/sec 39.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.25 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.6 Gpixels/sec 2.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.69 Gpixels/sec 2.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.55 Gpixels/sec 0.55 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 214.8 Gpixels/sec 191.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 7757.7 FPS 5921.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 979 479
DirectX 11 73 FPS 47 FPS
DirectX 12 37 FPS 42 FPS
GPU Compute 4162 Ops/s 3507 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2175 & 5094 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
302.04
752.18
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 94 & 268 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 890M
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-20 (ZB)Geekbench 6 OpenCL45651

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
9613
GB6 ML Half Precision
15157
GB6 ML Quantized
7082
Image Classification (SP) 3563 3489
Image Segmentation (HP) 6170 7528
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10762 6509
Face Detection (HP) 13773 13217
Pose Estimation (Q) 37861 24531
Text Classification (SP) 2572 2148
Machine Translation (HP) 4699 2764
Object Detection (SP) 2845 3948
Depth Estimation (Q) 17260 13355
Style Transfer (SP) 86751 60626
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 890M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released June 3, 2024 December 17, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Ampere
GPU Codename Strix Point GA107
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 140V -
Successor - Radeon 8065S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or above - Intel Core i5 11500H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
- AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
- AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
-
Laptop GPU ranking (98th and 96th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 735-1185 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 1245-1477 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1024 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 16 16
Tensor Cores No 64
Ray-tracing Cores 16 16
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 93 GPixel/s 40-47 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 186 GTexel/s 80-95 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
5.9 TFLOPS
5.1-6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
TGP 15 W 30-45 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 4 nm 8 nm
Die Size 233 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count 34 billion 8 billion
Transistor Density 145.92 MTr/mm² 40 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR6
Memory Size - 4 GB
Memory Clock - 1750 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 14000 Mbps
Bus - 64-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA None 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
67 (74.4%)
23 (25.6%)
Total votes: 90

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!