AMD Radeon RX 6500M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

We compared two discrete laptop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 6500M with 16 pipelines and 1024 shaders against the 1 year older GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 3050 Ti Mobile over RX 6500M
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6500M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 48%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 93% higher maximum theoretical performance (8.7 vs 4.5 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 65% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 38 vs 23 FPS
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 192 vs 128 GB/s
  • Achieves 39% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (65K vs 46K)
  • Has 2.5x more shading units (2560 vs 1024)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
67
35
27
16
85
49
41
25
The Witcher 3
43
38
19
10
79
62
42
20
Counter-Strike 2
64
45
29
13
128
89
65
26
Far Cry 6
53
44
30
16
67
58
46
22
Hogwarts Legacy
30
22
17
9
40
36
25
13
CoD: Modern Warfare III
43
39
26
17
53
42
28
21
Ghost of Tsushima
28
22
15
9
38
30
22
12
Cyberpunk 2077
30
27
13
-
44
40
24
10
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
55
43
28
14
74
68
47
23
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 46 68
1080p Ultra 35 53
1440p Ultra 23 38
4K Ultra 12 19
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
3854
5686
Time Spy 3824 5386
Solar Bay 15098 24115
Port Royal 248 569
Fire Strike 12352 13504
Wild Life Extreme 8137 10240
Night Raid 44693 56676
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
46706
65121
Background Blur 112.4 img/sec 107.9 img/sec
Face Detection 61.7 img/sec 62.6 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.49 Gpixels/sec 2.75 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 2.01 Gpixels/sec 3.61 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.81 Gpixels/sec 2.89 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.58 Gpixels/sec 0.81 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 183 Gpixels/sec 275.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 6313.2 FPS 8303.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
7306
10066
G2D Mark 365 499
DirectX 11 68 FPS 75 FPS
DirectX 12 33 FPS 49 FPS
GPU Compute 2499 Ops/s 4319 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]395 & 11100 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
384.34
1315.35
Sources: Blender [9], [10]20 & 753 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
8067
11209
GB6 ML Half Precision
9896
20383
GB6 ML Quantized
5967
7783
Image Classification (SP) 2972 4716
Image Segmentation (HP) 4132 12032
Image Super Resolution (Q) 9120 9965
Face Detection (HP) 11506 20723
Pose Estimation (Q) 35378 41186
Text Classification (SP) 1536 2133
Machine Translation (HP) 1869 3449
Object Detection (SP) 3259 5585
Depth Estimation (Q) 11922 19119
Style Transfer (SP) 81312 86331
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 6500M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released January 4, 2022 January 1, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
GPU Codename Navi 24 GA107 (GN20-P1)
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile - Radeon RX 6500M
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 6600H or above - Intel Core i7 12700H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (94th and 85th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 2000 MHz 735-1463 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 2190 MHz 1035-1695 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1024 2560
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 16 20
Tensor Cores - 80
Ray-tracing Cores 16 20
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70 GPixel/s 50-81 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 140 GTexel/s 83-136 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.5 TFLOPS
5.3-8.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 50 W 35-95 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 6 nm 8 nm
Die Size 107 mm² 276 mm²
Transistor Count 5.4 billion 12 billion
Transistor Density 50.47 MTr/mm² 43.48 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 12000 Mbps
Bus 64-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.2 3.0
CUDA - 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2
DisplayPort 1.4 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
3 (42.9%)
4 (57.1%)
Total votes: 7

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!