AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 6700 XT 12 GB with 2560 shaders against the 2 years and 3 months newer GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB 8 GB that utilizes 34 pipelines and 4352 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
12 GB GDDR6
VS
8 GB GDDR6
25.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
45.1
(Average)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4060 Ti 8GB over RX 6700 XT
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6700 XT
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Has 33% higher memory bandwidth: 384 vs 288 GB/s
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB
  • Performs better (up to 19%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 67% higher maximum theoretical performance (22.1 vs 13.2 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Shows 13% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 86 vs 76 FPS
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Has 70% more shading units (4352 vs 2560)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
158
93
74
53
150
97
84
61
The Witcher 3
145
122
88
45
167
137
98
52
Counter-Strike 2
229
156
111
61
239
187
136
76
Far Cry 6
121
106
82
50
129
119
95
54
Hogwarts Legacy
85
74
53
27
97
80
59
34
CoD: Modern Warfare III
118
113
75
50
121
112
80
53
Ghost of Tsushima
91
73
56
30
86
74
56
33
Cyberpunk 2077
91
80
47
21
102
91
57
26
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
153
139
95
48
164
146
109
58
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 132 139
1080p Ultra 106 116
1440p Ultra 76 86
4K Ultra 43 50
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
11421
13584
Time Spy 12818 13479
Solar Bay 50228 62428
Port Royal 6206 8103
Fire Strike 35843 34401
Wild Life Extreme 22931 25599
Night Raid 130269 136255
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
110742
127835
Background Blur 245.8 img/sec 198.3 img/sec
Face Detection 153.3 img/sec 126.2 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.99 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 5.82 Gpixels/sec 5.69 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.37 Gpixels/sec 6.72 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.01 Gpixels/sec 1.53 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 474.4 Gpixels/sec 656.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 13872.6 FPS 19149.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU
7420
14177

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
19718
22594
G2D Mark 954 1094
DirectX 11 172 FPS 202 FPS
DirectX 12 77 FPS 85 FPS
GPU Compute 9228 Ops/s 12003 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 14754 & 15714 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 1357 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
21026
22080
GB6 ML Half Precision
21983
36358
GB6 ML Quantized
16106
17354
Image Classification (SP) 9076 9359
Image Segmentation (HP) 10972 21463
Image Super Resolution (Q) 24228 26023
Face Detection (HP) 32365 42533
Pose Estimation (Q) 100249 99698
Text Classification (SP) 2204 3181
Machine Translation (HP) 4803 4956
Object Detection (SP) 9882 11009
Depth Estimation (Q) 37762 43518
Style Transfer (SP) 210688 203667
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 3, 2021 May 18, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $479 $399
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename Navi 22 AD106
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 4060 - Radeon RX 7700 XT
Successor - Radeon RX 9070 - GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 12600K or above - Intel Core i5 14600K or above
Desktop GPU rating (47th and 43rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 2321 MHz 2310 MHz
Boost Clock 2581 MHz 2535 MHz
Shading Units 2560 4352
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 160 136
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) - 34
Tensor Cores - 136
Ray-tracing Cores 40 34
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 3MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 165 GPixel/s 122 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 413 GTexel/s 345 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
13.2 TFLOPS
22.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 230 W 160 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 7 nm 5 nm
Die Size 335 mm² 188 mm²
Transistor Count 17 billion 22 billion
Transistor Density 50.75 MTr/mm² 117.02 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
RX 6700 XT +33%
384 GB/s
288 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
31 (55.4%)
25 (44.6%)
Total votes: 56

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!