MSI Titan GT77 vs Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of MSI Titan GT77 and Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
9.1
(Bad)
Value Index
20.4
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the MSI Titan GT77
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Features a a little bigger (~10%) battery – 99 against 90 watt-hours
Advantages of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022)
  • Easier to carry: weighs 200 grams less (around 0.44 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 18% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (172.7 vs 203 square inches)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 3.3 kg (7.28 lbs) 3.1 kg (6.84 lbs)
Dimensions 397 x 330 x 23 mm
15.63 x 12.99 x 0.91 inches
395 x 282 x 23.4-28.3 mm
15.55 x 11.1 x 0.92-1.11 inches
Area 1310 cm2 (203 inches2) 1114 cm2 (172.6 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~63% ~74.1%
Side bezels 7 mm 6 mm
Colors Black, Blue Black
Material Plastic Plastic
Transformer No No
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No Yes
Liquid metal No Yes
Number of fans 4 4
Max. fan speed (RPM) - 6000 RPM
Noise level (max. load) 61 dB 48 dB

Display

Size 17.3 inches 17.3 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 360 Hz 360 Hz
PPI 127 ppi 127 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:9 16:9
Resolution 1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels
HDR support No Yes, Dolby Vision
Sync technology G-Sync Adaptive Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Display tests
Contrast 1321:1 1100:1
sRGB color space 99.5% 97%
Adobe RGB profile 70.3% 70.9%
DCI-P3 color gamut 73.2% 73%
Response time 4 ms 3 ms
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time - 2:00 hr
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Left Bottom
Charge power 330 W 280 / 330 W
Weight of AC adapter 1335 grams 760 / 907 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.8 GHz 5 GHz
Cores 16 (8P + 8E) 14 (6P + 8E)
Threads 24 20
L3 Cache 25 MB 24 MB
Integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 150 W 150 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 8 nm 8 nm
GPU base clock 1035 MHz 1035 MHz
GPU boost clock 1485 MHz 1485 MHz
FLOPS 18.5 TFLOPS 18.5 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 256 bit 256 bit
Memory speed ~14 Gbps ~14 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 5632 5632
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 176 176
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 80 80
GPU performance 18.5 TFLOPS 18.5 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 3229 3700
Solar Bay 53760 56290
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x16 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 4800 MHz 4800 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 4 2
Max. ram size 128 GB 64 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x1024 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 4 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.2 (2 tweeters and 2 woofers) 4.0
Power 4x2W 4x2W
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Loudness ~87 dB ~81 dB
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.2 v5.3
Fingerprint Yes No
Infrared sensor Yes No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display -
Webcam resolution 1280 x 720 -
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort 1x v1.4 No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader Yes No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Mechanical Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.8 mm 2 mm
Touchpad
Size 13.0 x 8.0 cm 12.9 x 7.8 cm
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
58 (38.9%)
91 (61.1%)
Total votes: 149

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE (2022) and MSI Titan GT77 or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Electronic-Mainly July 19, 2022 at 03:11 AM
Jarrod'sTech compared two giants, and the result was that The Scar 17 SE is performing better slightly better in most of the games and benchmark score compare to MSI Titan GT77 under the same build. In Jarrod's YouTube video its TDP can go up to 171 Watt when tested compare to 175 watts TDP for Titan GT77. For which Titan GT77 should perform better according to more wattage and more power for performance theory, however, the lighter and smaller build Scar 17 SE outperforms GT77!
+5 Reply
Avatar
Gaming Nerd July 8, 2022 at 05:20 AM
You guys are awesome!!! :)
+5 Reply
Avatar
Gaming Nerd June 28, 2022 at 04:55 AM
The Scar SE GPU RTX 3080TI Mobile has a TDP of 175 watts, the 150 watts listing is incorrect.
+4 Reply
root June 28, 2022 at 01:23 PM
Thanks, we have fixed it :)
+5 Reply