Razer Blade 18 vs MSI Titan GT77 HX (2023)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Razer Blade 18 and MSI Titan GT77 HX (2023) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
21.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
25.7
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 240 versus 144 Hz
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 550 grams less (around 1.21 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 45% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Better webcam recording quality
  • Much smaller footprint: 22% more compact case (159.2 vs 203 square inches)
Advantages of the MSI Titan GT77 HX (2023)
  • Can run popular games at about 74-101% higher FPS
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Features a bigger (~22%) battery – 99.9 against 82 watt-hours
  • Around 10% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • 52% sharper screen – 255 versus 168 pixels per inch (PPI)
  • Provides 20% higher max. screen brightness: 600 vs 500 nits

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.75 kg (6.06 lbs) 3.3 kg (7.28 lbs)
Dimensions 395 x 260 x 19.9 mm
15.55 x 10.24 x 0.78 inches
397 x 330 x 23 mm
15.63 x 12.99 x 0.91 inches
Area 1027 cm2 (159.2 inches2) 1310 cm2 (203 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~91.5% ~63%
Side bezels 3.7 mm 7 mm
Colors Black Black
Material Aluminum Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 135°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber Yes No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 3 4
Noise level (max. load) 53.5 dB 61 dB

Display

Size 18 inches 17.3 inches
Type IPS LCD Mini LED
Refresh rate 240 Hz 144 Hz
PPI 168 ppi 255 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:9
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 3840 x 2160 pixels
HDR support No Yes, HDR10
Sync technology G-Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Screen space comparison
Blade 18
18″ (16:10 ratio) = 145.6 in2
Titan GT77 HX (2023)
17.3″ (16:9 ratio) = 127.9 in2
~13% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1037:1 6060000:1
sRGB color space 99.8% 99.9%
Adobe RGB profile 85.3% 92.4%
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 94.9%
Response time 6 ms -
Max. brightness
500 nits
600 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 1:30 hr 2:40 hr
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Left, Right Left, Right
Charge power 230 / 280 / 330 W 330 W
Weight of AC adapter 804 / 823 grams 1330 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.4 GHz 5.5 GHz
Cores 24 (8P + 16E) 24 (8P + 16E)
Threads 32 32
L3 Cache 36 MB 36 MB
Integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)
Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Blade 18 +4%
17946
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 140 W 175 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock 2295 MHz 1860 MHz
GPU boost clock 2370 MHz 2280 MHz
FLOPS 16 TFLOPS 37.6 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 192 bit
Memory speed ~16 Gbps ~18 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 3072 7424
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 96 232
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 48 80
GPU performance 16 TFLOPS 37.6 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
11021
Blender GPU 3627 6257
Solar Bay 47293 91546
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x16 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 5600 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 4
Max. ram size 64 GB 128 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x1024 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 3
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.2 (4 tweeters and 2 woofers) 2.2 (2 tweeters and 2 woofers)
Power - 4x2W
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Loudness ~85.7 dB ~90.1 dB
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.2 v5.3
Fingerprint No Yes
Infrared sensor Yes Yes
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 2560 x 1440 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No 1x v1.4
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader Yes Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Mechanical
Numpad No Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1 mm -
Touchpad
Size 17.0 x 9.7 cm -
Surface Glass Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on Blade 18:
    - All configurations come with 32GB DDR5 memory, except for the GeForce RTX 4060 version, which has 16GB. Memory can be upgraded up to 64GB.
    - GeForce RTX 4090 models have 2TB solid-state storage, while other models have 1 TB. Storage can be upgraded up to 8TB, with SATA SSD or mechanical hard drive options available.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
27 (39.7%)
41 (60.3%)
Total votes: 68

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of MSI Titan GT77 HX (2023) and Razer Blade 18 or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Dylan June 29, 2023 at 06:41 PM
The MSI reportedly has terrible screen response times, and I've heard the speaker accuracy is much worse. I'm baffled as to how you can credit the MSI for accessories when the webcam is 720p and resembles an iPhone from 2007, whereas the Blade's is at least usable, albeit not great. The Blade also has faster RAM, and for gaming, you're not going to be able to play at 4K 144Hz, but you can at 1440p 240Hz. Therefore, the extra power isn't usable, yet you still credit the MSI for the screen. I've watched hundreds of videos on both, and the discrepancies between your findings and theirs make it seem like there's a bias towards MSI. From everything I’ve seen, it slightly outperforms the Blade in terms of power and has a much better keyboard, but the extra power isn’t even usable because you can’t go above 144Hz.
+40 Reply