Honor 200 Pro vs Google Pixel 8
72
out of 100
VS
70
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Honor 200 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3) that was released on May 27, 2024, against the Google Pixel 8, which is powered by Google Tensor G3 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- Has a 0.58 inch larger screen size
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 27W)
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1698K versus 1443K)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- The phone is 8 months newer
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 8
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Delivers 29% higher peak brightness (1432 against 1110 nits)
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+1)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.85:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 437 ppi | 428 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4000 nits | 1400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 87.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.2% |
| PWM | 60 Hz | 170 Hz |
| Response time | 2 ms | 3 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
200 Pro
6.78″ (19.85:9 ratio) = 17.3 in2
Pixel 8
6.2″ (20:9 ratio) = 14.4 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) | 150.5 mm (5.93 inches) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) | 70.8 mm (2.79 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP65 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Gray, Rose gold |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Google Tensor G3 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 9 (1 + 4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 4 cores at 2.37 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 2.91 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 735 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 890 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS | ~1594.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 8821 | - |
| Single-core score | 1820 | 1722 |
| Multi-core score | 4579 | 4458 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 516831 | 535125 |
| GPU | 495795 | 387735 |
| Memory | 270542 | 186665 |
| UX | 414892 | 333906 |
| Total score | 1698060 | 1443431 |
| Samples | [16 tests] | [10 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 60% | 73% |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 998 | 971 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 17 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 19 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 17 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 14 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 4494 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15496 | - |
| Video editing | 7821 | - |
| Photo editing | 29476 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12021 | - |
| Writing score | 16099 | - |
Recent User Tests
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu 11 | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu 11 | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu 11 | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1421683 |
Google Pixel 8
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-28 (asfiii-malik) | AnTuTu 11 | 1515235 |
| 📘 2026-08-28 (asfiii-baloch) | AnTuTu 11 | 1515235 |
| 📘 2026-05-04 (reazz) | AnTuTu 11 | 1356451 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 -> tonymenny | AnTuTu 11 | 1446448 |
| 📘 2026-03-16 (Quan) | AnTuTu 11 | 1479583 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17) |
| ROM | MagicOS 10 | Stock Android |
| OS size | 55 GB | 14 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5200 mAh | 4575 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 27 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (66 W) | Yes (18 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (56% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 1:16 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:55 hr | 08:08 hr |
| Watching video | 08:13 hr | 14:06 hr |
| Gaming | 05:51 hr | 04:49 hr |
| Standby | 99 hr | 81 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 112° | 126° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | - | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50H | Samsung GNV |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Focal length | 68 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX856 | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX386 Exmor RS |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.9" (≈ 0.34 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.25 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 70 | 70 |
| Preview | 69 | 64 |
| Zoom | 132 | 129 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Google Pixel 8 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 10.5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2024 | October 2023 |
| Release date | May 2024 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $699 |
| Successor | - Honor 500 Pro | - Google Pixel 10 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, battery life, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Honor 200 Pro. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Google Pixel 8.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 45
Related comparisons
3.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)
