Vivo X200 vs OnePlus 12
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the OnePlus 12, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
- Delivers 36% higher peak brightness (1562 against 1152 nits)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 14% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2727K versus 2401K)
- 23% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2693 and 2182 points
- Weighs 23 grams less
- The phone is 10 months newer
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 12
- Shows 24% longer battery life (28:16 vs 22:51 hours)
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 91.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.5% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 11 ms |
| Contrast | - | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160.27 mm (6.31 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 74.81 mm (2.95 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 9.15 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue | White, Black, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3620 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 23954 | 15111 |
| Single-core score | 2693 | 2182 |
| Multi-core score | 8706 | 6465 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 849678 | 700922 |
| GPU | 932204 | 914074 |
| Memory | 352736 | 313211 |
| UX | 592804 | 573571 |
| Total score | 2727422 | 2401788 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [26 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 64% | 67% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2369 | 1676 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 57% |
| Graphics test | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 2 | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 10403 | 8360 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 83% |
| Graphics test | - | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4646 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13478 | 12226 |
| Video editing | 5647 | 6195 |
| Photo editing | 28707 | 23810 |
| Data manipulation | 11877 | 13418 |
| Writing score | 23394 | 17373 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (122nd and 154th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R) | AnTuTu | 2759839 |
| π 2025-12-27 (Losty) | AnTuTu | 2661708 |
| π 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen) | AnTuTu | 2844416 |
| π 2025-11-08 (Mahi) | AnTuTu | 2628512 |
| π 2025-11-04 (Palazz9rt_ hype) | AnTuTu | 2653518 |
OnePlus 12
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-20 -> nsy567808 | AnTuTu | 2317311 |
| π 2026-09-19 -> nsy567808 | AnTuTu | 2317311 |
| π 2026-08-26 (Luvish) | GeekBench GPU | 14849 |
| π 2026-08-26 (Luvish) | GeekBench CPU | 2267 / 7083 |
| π 2026-08-11 -> Lukisek.CZ | AnTuTu | 2612288 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 16 | OxygenOS 16 |
| OS size | - | 30 GB |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5800 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:39 hr | 0:24 hr |
| Web browsing | 10:06 hr | 13:10 hr |
| Watching video | 15:50 hr | 18:49 hr |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | 06:05 hr |
| Standby | 88 hr | 114 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#82nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 114Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.43" (β 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 | Sony IMX581 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Sony IMX615 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2024 | December 2023 |
| Release date | October 2024 | February 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $799 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 | - OnePlus 15 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance and gaming are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200. But if the battery life, connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority β go for the OnePlus 12.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 73
Related comparisons
1.
OnePlus 12 vs OnePlus 12R (1)
7.
Vivo X200 vs Vivo X200 Pro (1)