Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo X200
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Vivo X200, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Shows 10% longer battery life (25:14 vs 22:51 hours)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5800 mAh
- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (1750 against 1562 nits)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- The phone is 9 months newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
- Has a 0.36 inch larger screen size
- 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2727K versus 2140K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 22% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2693 and 2209 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200
6.67β³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
X200 FE
6.31β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) | 160.27 mm (6.31 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 74.81 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow | White, Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.99/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 100 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3620 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Immortalis-G925 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15299 | 23954 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 2693 |
| Multi-core score | 7239 | 8706 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662181 | 849678 |
| GPU | 664075 | 932204 |
| Memory | 295511 | 352736 |
| UX | 518654 | 592804 |
| Total score | 2140421 | 2727422 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 65% | 64% |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1561 | 2369 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 26 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Section 1 | 28 FPS | 43 FPS |
| Section 2 | 26 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | 35 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6745 | 10403 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13991 | 13478 |
| Video editing | 5556 | 5647 |
| Photo editing | 26454 | 28707 |
| Data manipulation | 12139 | 11877 |
| Writing score | 21943 | 23394 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#122nd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenΡ) | AnTuTu | 2148340 |
| π 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu | 2306009 |
| π 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu | 2235448 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu | 2140421 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu | 1793939 |
Vivo X200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R) | AnTuTu | 2759839 |
| π 2025-12-27 (Losty) | AnTuTu | 2661708 |
| π 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen) | AnTuTu | 2844416 |
| π 2025-11-08 (Mahi) | AnTuTu | 2628512 |
| π 2025-11-04 (Palazz9rt_ hype) | AnTuTu | 2653518 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | Funtouch OS 16 |
| OS size | 57 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (78% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:39 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:34 hr | 10:06 hr |
| Watching video | 15:00 hr | 15:50 hr |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | 07:21 hr |
| Standby | 108 hr | 88 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D10 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Samsung KD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) | 1/3.42" (β 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | July 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | $549 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 FE | - Vivo X300 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, and software are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200. But if the battery life, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority β go for the Vivo X200 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 68
Related comparisons
4.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)
7.
Vivo X200 vs Vivo X200 Pro (1)
8.
Vivo X200 vs Oppo Find X8 (9)