Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo X200

78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE
VS
81 out of 100
Vivo X200

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Vivo X200, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • Shows 10% longer battery life (25:14 vs 22:51 hours)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5800 mAh
  • Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (1750 against 1562 nits)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • The phone is 9 months newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
  • Has a 0.36 inch larger screen size
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2727K versus 2140K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • 22% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2693 and 2209 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
76*
81*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
78*
81*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
31.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
56.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 461 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Schott Xensation Core Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200
6.67β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
X200 FE
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
X200 FE +12%
1750 nits
1562 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) 160.27 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 74.81 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 186 g (6.56 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow White, Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.99/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) Β· 100 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
X200 FE +1%
90.3%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max clock 3400 MHz 3620 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Immortalis-G925 MC12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 FE and Vivo X200
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2209
Vivo X200 +22%
2693
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
7239
Vivo X200 +20%
8706
Compute Score (GPU)
15299
Vivo X200 +57%
23954
Compute Score (GPU) 15299 23954
Single-core score 2209 2693
Multi-core score 7239 8706
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2140421
Vivo X200 +27%
2727422
CPU 662181 849678
GPU 664075 932204
Memory 295511 352736
UX 518654 592804
Total score 2140421 2727422
Samples [10 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1561
Vivo X200 +52%
2369
Stability 65% 64%
Graphics test 12 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 1561 2369
3DMark Solar Bay
6745
Vivo X200 +54%
10403
Graphics test 26 FPS 40 FPS
Section 1 28 FPS 43 FPS
Section 2 26 FPS 40 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 35 FPS
Graphics score 6745 10403
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13962
Vivo X200 +3%
14338
Web score 13991 13478
Video editing 5556 5647
Photo editing 26454 28707
Data manipulation 12139 11877
Writing score 21943 23394
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#122nd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь)AnTuTu2148340
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu2306009
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu2235448
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu2140421
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu1793939
Vivo X200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R)AnTuTu2759839
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-27 (Losty)AnTuTu2661708
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen)AnTuTu2844416
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Mahi)AnTuTu2628512
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-04 (Palazz9rt_ hype)AnTuTu2653518

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Funtouch 15 Funtouch OS 16
OS size 57 GB -
OS updates 3 years 3 years
Security updates 4 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 5800 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes (48% in 30 min) Yes (78% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:58 hr 0:39 hr
Battery cycles 800 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:34 hr 10:06 hr
Watching video 15:00 hr 15:50 hr
Gaming 07:21 hr 07:21 hr
Standby 108 hr 88 hr
General battery life
X200 FE +10%
25:14 hr
22:51 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 119Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV08D10 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 25 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.1 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced June 2025 October 2024
Release date July 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $549
Successor - Vivo X300 FE - Vivo X300
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, and software are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X200. But if the battery life, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 FE.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
25 (36.8%)
43 (63.2%)
Total votes: 68

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!