Vivo X500 vs Vivo X200
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Vivo X500 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9600M) that was released on September 21, 2026, against the Vivo X200, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 2 years before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X500
- Comes with 1700 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5800 mAh
- 44% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3930K versus 2727K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Handles wireless charging up to 40W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- The phone is 2 years newer
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Ready for eSIM technology
- 23% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3314 and 2693 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
- Weighs 20 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2750 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 459 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 89.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 157.01 mm (6.18 inches) | 160.27 mm (6.31 inches) |
| Width | 74.49 mm (2.93 inches) | 74.81 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Pink | White, Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 3620 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Immortalis-G925 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 23954 |
| Single-core score | 3314 | 2693 |
| Multi-core score | 10400 | 8706 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1004925 | 849678 |
| GPU | 1316839 | 932204 |
| Memory | 477842 | 352736 |
| UX | 731113 | 592804 |
| Total score | 3930719 | 2727422 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 64% |
| Graphics test | - | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2369 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 40 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 43 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 40 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 35 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 10403 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 13478 |
| Video editing | - | 5647 |
| Photo editing | - | 28707 |
| Data manipulation | - | 11877 |
| Writing score | - | 23394 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (40th and 145th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X500
No benchmark results yet
Vivo X200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-26 (Lancer) | AnTuTu 12 | 2835451 |
| π 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN) | AnTuTu 11 | 2765026 |
| π 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R) | AnTuTu 11 | 2759839 |
| π 2025-12-27 (Losty) | AnTuTu 11 | 2661708 |
| π 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen) | AnTuTu 11 | 2844416 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 17 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | OriginOS 7 | Funtouch OS 16 |
| OS updates | 5 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (78% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:39 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 10:06 hr |
| Watching video | - | 15:50 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:21 hr |
| Standby | - | 88 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 72 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-610 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0" (β 0.5 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung KD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.42" (β 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2026 | October 2024 |
| Release date | September 2026 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $549 |
| Successor | - | - Vivo X500 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X500 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1