Xiaomi 15 vs Vivo X200

88 out of 100
Xiaomi 15
VS
81 out of 100
Vivo X200

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.36-inch Xiaomi 15 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 29, 2024, against the Vivo X200, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15
  • Shows 40% longer battery life (31:54 vs 22:51 hours)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 13% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3076K versus 2727K)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2940 and 2693 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Has a 0.31 inch larger screen size

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 15 and Vivo X200 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
53.5
(Average)
Value Index
56.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.36 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2670 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1500 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Xiaomi Shield Glass Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.5% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200
6.67″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Xiaomi 15
6.36″ (20:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1514 nits
Vivo X200 +3%
1562 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 152.3 mm (6 inches) 160.27 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 71.2 mm (2.8 inches) 74.81 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8.08 mm (0.32 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 191 g (6.74 oz) 197 g (6.95 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver, Green, Purple White, Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi 15 +1%
90.1%
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 15 and Vivo X200
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max clock 4320 MHz 3620 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Immortalis-G925 MC12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 15 and Vivo X200
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi 15 +9%
2940
2693
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi 15 +6%
9243
8706
Compute Score (GPU)
Xiaomi 15 +3%
24715
23954
Compute Score (GPU) 24715 23954
Single-core score 2940 2693
Multi-core score 9243 8706
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Xiaomi 15 +13%
3076179
2727422
CPU 946469 849678
GPU 1118762 932204
Memory 372907 352736
UX 638041 592804
Total score 3076179 2727422
Samples [32 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2204
Vivo X200 +7%
2369
Stability 82% 64%
Graphics test 16 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2204 2369
3DMark Solar Bay
10153
Vivo X200 +2%
10403
Graphics test 39 FPS 40 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 43 FPS
Section 2 39 FPS 40 FPS
Section 3 33 FPS 35 FPS
Graphics score 10153 10403
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
5782
n/a
Stability 89% -
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5782 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi 15 +22%
17440
14338
Web score 18558 13478
Video editing 8103 5647
Photo editing 37685 28707
Data manipulation 13755 11877
Writing score 21293 23394
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (85th and 122nd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 15
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-24 (zaido)AnTuTu3236909
📘 2026-08-16 (jakisgood)AnTuTu3007116
📘 2026-08-03 (abdurashidovvv)AnTuTu3102543
📘 2026-08-02 (Hans)GeekBench CPU2859 / 8837
📘 2026-08-02 (Hans)AnTuTu2934836
Vivo X200
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R)AnTuTu2759839
📘 2025-12-27 (Losty)AnTuTu2661708
📘 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen)AnTuTu2844416
📘 2025-11-08 (Mahi)AnTuTu2628512
📘 2025-11-04 (Palazz9rt_ hype)AnTuTu2653518

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 Funtouch OS 16
OS size 21 GB -
OS updates 4 years 3 years
Security updates 5 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5400 mAh 5800 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (83% in 30 min) Yes (78% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:45 hr 0:39 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:20 hr 10:06 hr
Watching video 19:22 hr 15:50 hr
Gaming 07:10 hr 07:21 hr
Standby 150 hr 88 hr
General battery life
Xiaomi 15 +40%
31:54 hr
22:51 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.6x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 115° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision Light Fusion 900 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.6
Focal length 60 mm 70 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 14 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 75 -
Preview 87 -
Zoom 152 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 15 from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 22 mm 25 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV32B Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.3 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 October 2024
Release date October 2024 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $945 $549
Successor - Xiaomi 17 - Vivo X300
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 15 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
132 (72.1%)
51 (27.9%)
Total votes: 183

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!