Tensor G3 vs Tensor G2

We compared the 9-core Google Tensor G3 (Mali-G715 MP7) with the older 8-core Tensor G2 (Mali-G710 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G3
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 19%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1409K vs 1186K
  • Has 1 more cores
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Tensor G3 +19%
1409016
1186373
CPU 482403 384056
GPU 384611 278383
Memory 218603 220709
UX 323399 303255
Total score 1409016 1186373
Samples [33 tests] [54 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tensor G3 +18%
1722
1461
Multi-Core Score
Tensor G3 +15%
4458
3867
Asset compression 197.6 MB/sec 149.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 134.7 pages/sec 99.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 148.4 Mpixels/sec 110.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 82.1 images/sec 74.2 images/sec
HDR 142.1 Mpixels/sec 105.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 13.2 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 48.4 images/sec 35.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.34 Mpixels/sec 4.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tensor G3 +71%
8076
4715
Background blur 10.6 images/sec 6.68 images/sec
Face detection 6.85 images/sec 3.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.9 Gpixels/sec 11.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1088 FPS 972.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 9 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tensor G3 +40%
982
702
Score 982 702
Stability 74% 78%
Graphics test 7 FPS 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
1821
Score - 1821
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 10 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
n/a
10994
Web score - 7923
Video editing score - 6434
Data manipulation score - 11061
Photo editing score - 18842
Writing score - 15053
Phones tested - 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-malik)AnTuTu 111515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-baloch)AnTuTu 111515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (s1mpick)AnTuTu 111338293
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (reazz)AnTuTu 111356451
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Bilal Ahmed)AnTuTu 111367231
Google Tensor G2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> putkin_prosrochka59AnTuTu 121477460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> Kimash333AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kimash333)AnTuTu 111253847
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> nanamondAnTuTu 111196742
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 -> shu-AnTuTu 111126520

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G3 and Tensor G2

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 9 8
Frequency 2910 MHz 2850 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 MP7 Mali-G710 MP7
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 890 MHz 848 MHz
Pipelines 7 7
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 896 448
FLOPS 1594.8 Gigaflops 759.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300i Exynos 5300g
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 7350 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2023 October 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS301 (S5P9865) GS201 (S5P9855)
Official page Google Tensor G3 official site -
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
753 (85.5%)
128 (14.5%)
Total votes: 881

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G2 and Tensor G3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Inder December 31, 2023 at 01:24 PM
Manufactured by Samsung? Lol!! Can't believe the other specs now!
+11 Reply
Avatar
Nate March 9, 2024 at 11:17 AM
The chips are fabricated using Samsung foundries. So yeah. It is correct. I suggest reading up on fabrication technology. TSMC and Samsung do a lot of the phone chips among many other things.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Shines November 25, 2023 at 09:34 PM
Having a max power consumption of just 4.7w is incredible!
+24 Reply
Avatar
Ysuh October 5, 2023 at 07:20 AM
Tensor GHz here is wrong. The Cortex X3 used here didn't go past 3GHz. It's just 2.9-ish GHz. Please update.
+26 Reply
Serhii October 6, 2023 at 07:59 AM
Ok, we will check specs.
+11 Reply
Avatar
just a question May 31, 2024 at 05:40 PM
They probably made it only go up to 2.9 GHz to make it consume less power. That's my theory.
+3 Reply