Tensor G4 vs A16 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G4
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~49%)
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 3100 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1626K vs 1519K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1519937
1626008
CPU 536742 432740
GPU 414930 490354
Memory 215572 216774
UX 352693 486140
Total score 1519937 1626008
Samples [25 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1707
A16 Bionic +54%
2631
Multi-Core Score
4431
A16 Bionic +49%
6602
Asset compression 177.3 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 134 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 157 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 122 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 128.3 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.8 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 39.2 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8744
A16 Bionic +161%
22851
Background blur 13.4 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 8.51 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.3 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.36 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 26.4 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1273.7 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 9 tests 12 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1049 -
Stability 84% -
Graphics test 8 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 16 FPS
Section 1 - 20 FPS
Section 2 - 16 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3335
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 19 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13174
Web score 10521 -
Video editing score 7569 -
Data manipulation score 14718 -
Photo editing score 21074 -
Writing score 15880 -
Phones tested 4 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 -> zevaldGeekbench 7 GPU7853
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 -> zevaldGeekbench 7 CPU1497 / 4221
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 111423579
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu 111626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Gurudev)AnTuTu 111226584
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Атомная Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°)AnTuTu 111772840
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G4 and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3100 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 MP7 Apple A16 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 940 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 7 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 640
FLOPS 1684.4 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution - 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400c -
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced August 2024 September 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS401 (S5P9875) APL1W10
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
58 (36.3%)
102 (63.7%)
Total votes: 160

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Tensor G4, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!