Kirin 9020 vs Kirin 9010

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (with Maleoon 920 graphics) and Kirin 9010 (Maleoon 910). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9020
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 9010
  • Shows better (up to 18%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1383K vs 1177K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9020 +18%
1383793
1177196
CPU 484142 512832
GPU 269177 131160
Memory 340806 270499
UX 289668 262705
Total score 1383793 1177196
Samples [10 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1370
1421
Multi-Core Score
4446
4323
Asset compression 169.6 MB/sec 170.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 129.9 pages/sec 126.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 126.6 Mpixels/sec 142.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 85.1 images/sec 81.5 images/sec
HDR 118.5 Mpixels/sec 120.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 43.4 images/sec 43.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.21 Mpixels/sec 5.08 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 9020 +84%
4881
2655
Background blur 6.04 images/sec 5.55 images/sec
Face detection 3.28 images/sec 3.09 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 10.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 568.2 FPS 364.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 6 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 454 -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1393
Graphics test - 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 8954
Video editing score - 5507
Data manipulation score - 9506
Photo editing score - 20710
Writing score - 13994
Phones tested - Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu1372431
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu1291607
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu1328024
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu1395526
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu1337422
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikGeekBench GPU2440
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikGeekBench CPU1429 / 4124
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikAnTuTu1210912
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Ridnitxx)AnTuTu1234325
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 -> zrewzqqAnTuTu1160750

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 9020 and Kirin 9010

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little
1x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.18 GHz – TaiShan V121
4x 1.55 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 10 MB 8 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing SMIC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Maleoon 920 Maleoon 910
Architecture Maleoon Maleoon
GPU frequency 840 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 4 4
Shading units 256 256
Total shaders 1024 1024
FLOPS 1720.3 Gigaflops 1536 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 6000 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced November 2024 April 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number Hi36C0V110 Hi36A0V121
Successor - - HiSilicon Kirin 9020

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
245 (96.8%)
8 (3.2%)
Total votes: 253

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9010 and Kirin 9020, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Turner March 6, 2025 at 10:22 AM
Actually Kirin 9010/9020 gaming experience is good enough for 90% users.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Senn Lens YT December 19, 2024 at 04:40 AM
Woah! I'm very surprised that Kirin 9020 is extremely very powerful than Kirin 9010/9000S (after Huawei was banned to make their own processor under TSMC which is now making processor under SMIC). But still, Kirin 9020 is between Tensor G4 and Dimensity 8300 in Nanoreview ranking. I guess Huawei mostly focus on camera instead of gaming. But I need to see their performance on gaming which I'm looking forward soon.
+26 Reply