Dimensity 9400 vs Kirin 9020

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (Maleoon 920). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2825K vs 1383K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~92%)
  • 45% higher CPU clock speed (3620 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 9020

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2825187
1383793
CPU 900074 484142
GPU 972096 269177
Memory 345330 340806
UX 607687 289668
Total score 2825187 1383793
Samples [72 tests] [10 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2797
1370
Multi-Core Score
8767
4446
Asset compression 344.4 MB/sec 169.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 251 pages/sec 129.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 258.4 Mpixels/sec 126.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 209.7 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 267.4 Mpixels/sec 118.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 30.9 images/sec 14.7 images/sec
Photo processing 84.4 images/sec 43.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.3 Mpixels/sec 5.21 Mpixels/sec
Samples 22 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21574
4881
Background blur 43 images/sec 6.04 images/sec
Face detection 19.8 images/sec 3.28 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.63 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.71 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 73.3 Gpixels/sec 20.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3456.3 FPS 568.2 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 17 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2371
Score 2371 454
Stability 61% -
Graphics test 18 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 10747 -
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 46 FPS -
Section 2 42 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 6272 -
Graphics test 37 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14420 -
Video editing score 6211 -
Data manipulation score 16192 -
Photo editing score 30985 -
Writing score 19569 -
Phones tested 6 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN)AnTuTu 112765026
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu 111372431
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu 111291607
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu 111328024
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu 111395526
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu 111337422

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 and Kirin 9020

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.62 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3620 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 12 MB 10 MB
Process 3 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Maleoon 920
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Maleoon
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 12 4
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 1536 1024
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 1720.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Da Vinci
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 6000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 November 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA Hi36C0V110
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
46 (71.9%)
18 (28.1%)
Total votes: 64

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9020 and Dimensity 9400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!