Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Kirin 9010

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (with Adreno 730 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9010 (Maleoon 910). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • 30% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~9%)
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1294K vs 1177K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1294871
1177196
CPU 490530 512832
GPU 202615 131160
Memory 221583 270499
UX 380143 262705
Total score 1294871 1177196
Samples [90 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 151.4 MB/sec 170.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 104.2 pages/sec 126.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 124.3 Mpixels/sec 142.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 88.5 images/sec 81.5 images/sec
HDR 119.9 Mpixels/sec 120.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.3 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 38.4 images/sec 43.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.49 Mpixels/sec 5.08 Mpixels/sec
Samples 54 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
5692
2655
Background blur 9.81 images/sec 5.55 images/sec
Face detection 4.42 images/sec 3.09 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.3 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 15.8 Gpixels/sec 10.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1079.5 FPS 364.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 30 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 729 -
Graphics test 5 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 2255 1393
Stability 63% -
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13509
10560
Web score 13237 8954
Video editing score 7311 5507
Data manipulation score 10976 9506
Photo editing score 27827 20710
Writing score 15631 13994
Phones tested 16 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 88 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 114 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 40 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Khaled)AnTuTu1341721
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (Jonath)AnTuTu1005770
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (Hireath)GeekBench CPU1432 / 3945
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Abdullah)AnTuTu1324059
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 -> Aura_Test_KingGeekBench GPU3761
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikGeekBench GPU2440
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikGeekBench CPU1429 / 4124
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 -> pivozavrikAnTuTu1210912
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Ridnitxx)AnTuTu1234325
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 -> zrewzqqAnTuTu1160750

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Kirin 9010

CPU

Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.18 GHz – TaiShan V121
4x 1.55 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3000 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5.3 W -
Manufacturing Samsung SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 730 Maleoon 910
Architecture Adreno 700 Maleoon
GPU frequency 818 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 512 256
Total shaders 1024 1024
FLOPS 1675.3 Gigaflops 1536 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X65 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2021 April 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8450 Hi36A0V121
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - HiSilicon Kirin 9020

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
325 (56.9%)
246 (43.1%)
Total votes: 571

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9010 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
rahim April 23, 2024 at 01:34 AM
The HiSilicon 9010 significantly outperforms the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in gaming. Trust me on this.
+63 Reply
Avatar
Eric Davies April 26, 2024 at 06:21 PM
I don't have any skin in the game but I'd want to see some performance numbers.
+10 Reply
Avatar
RDS May 3, 2024 at 06:12 AM
This is utter nonsense. It's just a trashy old 7nm chip with a pathetic GPU.
+55 Reply
Avatar
Capitalismftw September 20, 2024 at 10:45 AM
RDS, Lol You forgot the nonplus version that is using Samsung node. Its even worse than SD 870. If 9010 can stay cool it can beat none plus version. Nodes doesnt mean much. Even Intel was doing ok with 10 nm while everyone is at 7 nm before the 13xxx and 14xxx gen diaster.
+5 Reply