Kirin 990 (5G) vs Kirin 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) (with Mali-G76 MP16 graphics) and Kirin 9000 (Mali-G78 MP24). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~27%)
  • Supports 29% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 22%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1079K vs 887K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (3130 vs 2860 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9000 +22%
1079281
CPU 370957 370173
GPU 142673 275434
Memory 172126 158011
UX 202120 275663
Total score 887876 1079281
Samples [7 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 9000 +24%
1262
Multi-Core Score
3507
Asset compression 146.4 MB/sec 146.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 82.7 pages/sec 90.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 114.4 Mpixels/sec 113.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 68.9 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
HDR 100.5 Mpixels/sec 98.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.1 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 34.5 images/sec 29.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.44 Mpixels/sec 4.01 Mpixels/sec
Samples 5 tests 71 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 9000 +58%
7580
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Face detection 4.68 images/sec 6.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.1 Gpixels/sec 28.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 628.3 FPS 1164.8 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2062
Stability - 90%
Graphics test - 12 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 5096
Video editing score - 6152
Data manipulation score - 6691
Photo editing score - 16500
Writing score - 8573

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
81 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 44 FPS
[Ultra]
44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 30 FPS
[High]
29 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Huawei Honor 30 Pro Plus
1200 x 2640
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
1344 x 3140
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Nikotik)AnTuTu891785
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)CPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)AnTuTu823339
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-24 (Maestro)AnTuTu827011
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-30 (AMK)GeekBench CPU1018 / 3387
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 990 (5G) and Kirin 9000

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2860 MHz 3130 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 8 billion 15.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP16 Mali-G78 MP24
Architecture Bifrost 3rd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 600 MHz 759 MHz
Pipelines 16 24
Shading units 24 32
Total shaders 384 768
FLOPS 460.8 Gigaflops 1165.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci AI accelerator

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.1 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VC-1
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 5000 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4600 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2019 October 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Official page HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) official site HiSilicon Kirin 9000 official site
Successor - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
57 (12.7%)
393 (87.3%)
Total votes: 450

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000 and Kirin 990 (5G), or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!