Dimensity 810 vs Kirin 810

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 810 (with Mali-G57 MP2 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 810 (Mali-G52 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 810
  • Higher GPU frequency (~30%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2270 MHz)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 810
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17.07 GB/s)
  • Performs 73% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
569913
565851
CPU 228631 237193
GPU 46684 62117
Memory 137506 136030
UX 157092 130511
Total score 569913 565851
Samples [4 tests] [7 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 810 +17%
797
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 810 +12%
2120
Asset compression 93.2 MB/sec 100.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 49 pages/sec 50.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 70.2 Mpixels/sec 71.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36.2 images/sec 40.4 images/sec
HDR 58.4 Mpixels/sec 63.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.45 images/sec 6.51 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 20.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.78 Mpixels/sec 2.93 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 810 +95%
2693
Background blur 2.12 images/sec 4.17 images/sec
Face detection 1.03 images/sec 2.46 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.05 Gpixels/sec 8.71 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 242.1 FPS 296.2 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples - 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 150 -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Kirin 810 +4%
382
Score 367 382
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
9951
8096
Web score 8724 5842
Video editing score 6058 5734
Data manipulation score 7484 7440
Photo editing score 26572 15184
Writing score 10586 9275
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Low]
30 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[High]
41 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Low]
29 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Low]
43 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 56 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 37 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
1080 x 2400
Huawei Honor 9X
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 (Nam)AnTuTu608161
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 -> Harsha9849AnTuTu579097
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-23 (Klim)AnTuTu569913
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (Gab)AnTuTu560120
HiSilicon Kirin 810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-02 (ΠœΡƒΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρƒ)AnTuTu565851
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-28 (Shane Trollip)AnTuTu572016
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-09 (SAMJF1)AnTuTu551097
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-28 (temp001)AnTuTu542939
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-26 (Dimon)AnTuTu575909

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 810 and Kirin 810

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2270 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G52 MP6
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 2nd gen
GPU frequency 1068 MHz 820 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 32 24
Total shaders 64 144
FLOPS 136.7 Gigaflops 236.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 3.0 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 2K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 2K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced August 2021 June 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6833V Hi6280
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 810 official site HiSilicon Kirin 810 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 6080 - HiSilicon Kirin 820

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
111 (37.5%)
185 (62.5%)
Total votes: 296

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 810 and Dimensity 810, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!