Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Helio G200 vs Helio G100 – what's better?

Helio G200 vs Helio G100

Helio G200
VS
Helio G100
Helio G200
Helio G100

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G200 (with Mali-G57 MP2 graphics) and Helio G100 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (31)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
  • Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 11 score – 603K vs 575K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Helio G200
vs
Helio G100

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G200 +5%
603568
Helio G100
575630
CPU 214794 199433
GPU 46951 44194
Memory 174399 155279
UX 167424 176724
Total score 603568 575630
Samples [64 tests] [133 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Helio G200
1927
Helio G100 +5%
2014
Asset compression 96.3 MB/sec 99.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 50.5 pages/sec 50.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.5 Mpixels/sec 67.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 38.6 images/sec 38.9 images/sec
HDR 62.9 Mpixels/sec 61.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.52 images/sec 5.54 images/sec
Photo processing 18.9 images/sec 17.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.85 Mpixels/sec 2.88 Mpixels/sec
Samples 12 tests 26 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G200 +2%
1492
Helio G100
1467
Background blur 2.33 images/sec 2.2 images/sec
Face detection 1.23 images/sec 1.08 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.12 Gpixels/sec 4.14 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 229.7 FPS 251.1 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 9 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Helio G200 +1%
147
Helio G100
146
Score 147 146
Stability - 97%
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Helio G200
10715
Helio G100
10665
Web score 10906 10489
Video editing score 6350 6308
Data manipulation score 6596 7401
Photo editing score 24766 24558
Writing score 12775 12509
Phones tested 4 models 14 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio G200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (Jonython)AnTuTu 12737891
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (___Jack___)AnTuTu 11646655
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (___Jack___)AnTuTu 12736425
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (___Jack___)AnTuTu 12724942
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (kean)AnTuTu 11594952
Add View all (75)
MediaTek Helio G100
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> MarvinAnTuTu 12713020
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> its_bhhb.44AnTuTu 11562129
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> its_bhhb.44AnTuTu 12661409
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> vlaxxAnTuTu 12676283
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (vlaxx)AnTuTu 12676283
Add View all (155)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G200 and Helio G100

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1100 MHz 1000 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 64 64
FLOPS 140.8 Gigaflops 128 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 650 Mbps Up to 650 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 August 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - MT6789H
Official page MediaTek Helio G200 official site MediaTek Helio G100 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Helio G200

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1211 (64%)
680 (36%)
Total votes: 1891

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400
2. MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
3. MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
4. MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (21)
5. MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
6. MediaTek Helio G100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4)
7. MediaTek Helio G100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (5)
8. MediaTek Helio G100 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (34)
9. MediaTek Helio G100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (1)
10. MediaTek Helio G100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G100 and Helio G200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
MIs August 21, 2026 at 06:41 PM
what did it change?It’s almost same between g100 ultra and g 200.A lot of trickery of mediatek
0 Reply
Avatar
Mitch November 22, 2025 at 02:56 PM
Basically the same with few optimisations. Design a better Helio chipset with 4xA76 and 4xG68 cores on 6nm process
+14 Reply
Avatar
Ahmed khaled September 24, 2025 at 06:34 PM
Joke, it is same i do not see any updates
+33 Reply
Avatar
Hoda September 7, 2025 at 05:55 PM
Same same Same same, but different But still sameπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
+53 Reply
Avatar
Tabish August 17, 2025 at 06:14 AM
A joke literally. I feel sorry for the people tricked in to paying a premium just because its marketed as a new g200 soc.
+23 Reply
Avatar
randomguy August 11, 2025 at 02:47 AM
I think they keep renaming this soc to make it sound like a new soc, and smartphone company still using this soc for their new phone, i don't have a problem with that
+4 Reply
Avatar
ABKK August 6, 2025 at 09:44 PM
What a mess Only 3% faster
+48 Reply
Avatar
Artey August 1, 2025 at 08:46 AM
Same old shit. Seriously, imagine if the Helio G95 was built on 6nm; it would be a beast. Because my three-and-above-years G95 still runs smoothly with all my favorite games - superb CODM, Genshin Impact, eFootball, etc. Wish it was built on a smaller nm.
+23 Reply
Avatar
Zan September 1, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Codm is a valid reason but genshin? no G95 is only running at lowest graphics smoothly they're the same as G99 but G99 has the upperhand when making it to 60 fps and Medium settings because it can handle temps than G95 even if it's built on a 6nm it won't change that's why G99 was invented because G95 drains and overheats so fast
+11 Reply
Avatar
Aryan November 15, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Zan, G99 is shit bro but g95 is beast in budget, arm mali G76 MC4 graphics, 4k 30fps , but g99 stuck on 2k 30 fos
+4 Reply
Avatar
Bababoi July 31, 2026 at 04:50 AM
Zan, G95 absolutely CAN run GENSHIN, but it will overheat a lot.
0 Reply
Avatar
rRR July 27, 2025 at 05:59 PM
At least there is a 100 MHz GPU overclock, because G100 had the exactly same CPU and GPU clocks.
+17 Reply
Avatar
dani July 24, 2025 at 05:37 PM
this comparison is basically a "g99 ultra pro vs g99 ultra pro max"
+47 Reply
Avatar
Mat 123 . July 24, 2025 at 02:09 AM
What is iphone 6 processor
+22 Reply
Avatar
Ys khan November 22, 2025 at 10:40 AM
The iphone 6 all models running on the same processor A10 fusion such as 6s and 6s plus!
+2 Reply
Avatar
Khasan July 22, 2025 at 12:06 PM
they are renaming Helio g90t
+9 Reply
Avatar
a7med July 23, 2025 at 05:43 PM
2018 g90t is better
+24 Reply
Avatar
JDMY August 13, 2025 at 09:58 AM
a7med, No. G100 and G200 are clearly better because 6nm + 2,2 Ghz are more important than the GPU weakness from these socs compared to G90T
+4 Reply
Avatar
Jero-Raito July 22, 2025 at 12:48 AM
I know they're just renaming the G99 at this point, but a small difference is a small difference.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Ahsan2911 July 19, 2025 at 07:18 AM
What's the difference between them only gpu clock 1k to 1.1k, nothing improved else, must boost the main CPU clock almost 2.4 Ghz
+2 Reply
Avatar
Khasan July 22, 2025 at 12:05 PM
they improved it's name
+16 Reply
Avatar
It's always a rebrand July 14, 2025 at 04:02 AM
This is basically the same performance as the g90 from years ago bruh, and even that has support for 4K which the newer ones don't. typical greedy soc companies as always
+8 Reply
Avatar
Haha June 22, 2026 at 01:04 AM
It's budget soc bro
0 Reply
Avatar
Best prossasor g100 July 13, 2025 at 08:19 PM
Best prossaasor g100
+2 Reply
Avatar
Ouzi July 11, 2025 at 04:35 AM
Ah, not much different.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Sky July 4, 2025 at 07:23 PM
I'd choose Helio g100 because it's the same thing. Heck even G96 is better than this. 4% AnTuTu difference. Such trash
+25 Reply
Avatar
8th_Ascendant June 10, 2025 at 05:16 AM
This Helio saga is ridiculous. Modern Dimensity / Snapdragon SoCs already have the option to automatically switch to either 5G or 4G depending on the signal received by your phone
+19 Reply
Avatar
Danny June 9, 2025 at 07:49 PM
And they will keep rebranding the same chipset over and over again until Helio G1000!
+32 Reply
Avatar
fuuk1 May 27, 2025 at 05:14 PM
Cheap and lazy refreshes… MediaTek releases a great SoC then does a lazy refresh later for some other then does that again for some other thing and then maybe do a good one; rinse and repeat. It's lame…
+24 Reply
Avatar
RollyGhiz May 31, 2025 at 05:59 PM
An added support for 4K recording would have been a great update that will be very much appreciated. Or they've should've overclocked the performance cores cause this isn't even a refresh of the same chip; it's literally the same.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Don't you know anything? June 1, 2025 at 08:51 PM
Mediatek: No it's not! Don't you see that in the G200 the GPU frequency is 100 MHz higher? A small change in frequency makes the G200 completely different from the G100 specifically and a completely new chip in general!
+42 Reply
EnglishРусский