Snapdragon 680 vs Helio G96

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G96 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Performs 2.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
  • 17% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~17%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G96
  • Shows better (up to 16%) AnTuTu 11 score – 493K vs 424K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G96 +16%
493222
CPU 185604 182454
GPU 26544 44018
Memory 114814 129323
UX 97254 137427
Total score 424216 493222
Samples [82 tests] [15 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G96 +64%
674
Multi-Core Score
Helio G96 +26%
1793
Asset compression 85.7 MB/sec 93.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43.2 pages/sec 48.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 59.4 Mpixels/sec 65.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 15.7 images/sec 36 images/sec
HDR 49.8 Mpixels/sec 57.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.98 images/sec 5.54 images/sec
Photo processing 11.3 images/sec 18.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.59 Mpixels/sec 2.77 Mpixels/sec
Samples 35 tests 10 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G96 +254%
1232
Background blur 0.32 images/sec 1.83 images/sec
Face detection 0.16 images/sec 0.91 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.48 Gpixels/sec 3.59 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 26.6 FPS 216.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 20 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 132
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Helio G96 +89%
325
Score 172 325
Stability 97% 99%
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Helio G96 +16%
8606
Web score 7531 7155
Video editing score 4072 5051
Data manipulation score 6097 7218
Photo editing score 14785 17332
Writing score 8535 9682
Phones tested 16 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[Medium]
72 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
42 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 23 FPS
[Low]
26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 65 FPS
[Low]
58 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 62 FPS
[Medium]
66 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact 26 FPS
[Low]
23 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 54 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (Eron)AnTuTu521704
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (That one guy)AnTuTu441460
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 -> a05stechAnTuTu448569
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (A05stech)AnTuTu448569
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (Mohammed)GeekBench GPU348
MediaTek Helio G96
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Vors)AnTuTu517127
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Victor monteiiro)GeekBench CPU664 / 1929
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-22 (PowerS)AnTuTu550230
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-16 (Lahmacun)AnTuTu450527
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-08 (Nathaniel)AnTuTu512142

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 680 and Helio G96

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1114 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 1 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 128 64
FLOPS 285.2 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 10 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 -
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 390 Mbps Up to 650 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 June 2021
Class Low end Mid range
Model number SM6225 MT6781
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site MediaTek Helio G96 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Helio G99

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
377 (32%)
802 (68%)
Total votes: 1179

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G96 and Snapdragon 680, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Shuyeb Fahim May 22, 2024 at 07:55 AM
The G96, or Realme Narzo 50, has serious heating and battery issues. It reaches 43-44Β°C while gaming at room temperature.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Guest January 11, 2023 at 08:27 AM
Why 680 uses ARMv8-A with cortex A73/A53 while the older 720g uses newer ARMv8.2-A architecture with A76/A55?
+187 Reply
Avatar
Poteto April 24, 2022 at 11:44 PM
While the g96 is clearly a sizeably better chip, I’d still choose the 680 for the battery life and Bluetooth codecs. Gaming on 12nm gets really hot, from the g90T experience. I recommend a 778 or equivalent dimensity minimum for gaming.
+150 Reply
Avatar
Karan June 5, 2022 at 07:03 PM
That doesn't matter until you try, and in the case of a battery 5000 mah is huge, it doesn't affect much in practice it's just in words that better battery life... performance, and power matter that what g96 gives you.
+92 Reply
Avatar
Sajad March 17, 2022 at 03:37 PM
G96 has a heating issue
+272 Reply
Avatar
David March 22, 2022 at 01:19 AM
At witch temp? using what?
+206 Reply
Avatar
random June 12, 2022 at 12:46 AM
David, it is not a heating issue! it just gets hotter than the other one, while gaming or sum like that, but it has a better performance
+41 Reply
Avatar
Guest November 4, 2022 at 05:39 AM
random, The issue is, Mediatek cannot stop making their Helio chipsets 12nm. If only they can stop abusing 12nm to their chipsets and make it around 8-6 nm then the problem would be solved.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Qualcomm thick boy December 9, 2022 at 09:48 PM
Guest, Not only that, but at least the 10nm fabrication process should be good enough.
+4 Reply
Avatar
Otry January 13, 2023 at 11:37 AM
Guest, haven't you heard of the Helio G99 6nm chip?
+25 Reply
Avatar
Marius March 13, 2023 at 04:26 PM
random, Yeah, it has more power, but when the G96 reaches up to 45Β°C, the frame drops and lag become so annoying, while the SD 680 doesn't have those issues. By the way, the SD 680 has improved even more, and I got a score of 310k on Antutu. So, which one is better?
+69 Reply