Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 617K vs 592K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 256848 237904
GPU 60984 56314
Memory 129362 136317
UX 170432 161480
Total score 617626 592015
Samples [31 tests] [83 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 113.8 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 56.2 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 80.5 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 43.3 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 73 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 20 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.33 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.85 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 1.39 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.63 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 260.6 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 360
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14003 9704
Video editing score 4563 3911
Data manipulation score 9260 8663
Photo editing score 24716 18151
Writing score 14763 13129
Phones tested 5 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Julianpowke)AnTuTu597734
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-26 (Gigi)AnTuTu591791
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-26 (Sam)AnTuTu586585
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Aditya)AnTuTu624333
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-06 (Moto)AnTuTu612327
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 900 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 460.8 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2024 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375-AC SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1049 (66.6%)
526 (33.4%)
Total votes: 1575

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Aditya July 1, 2026 at 09:14 AM
If they made a same name as 6s gen 3 in 4 nm and cpu 2400 mhz and gpu 955 mhz and support wifi 6 and bluetooth 5.4 and lpddr5 and ufs 3.1 for budget phones it will be capable :)
0 Reply
Avatar
Erik November 11, 2025 at 05:32 AM
people hating 6s gen 3 for being a rebrand, but in fact still a beast among all of entry level soc
+6 Reply
Avatar
Joshua November 28, 2025 at 07:44 PM
Until you realize that 5g beasts like the dimensity 7300 are slowly creeping in to the entry level market. I got the Poco x7 5g for only $150 and I have to say, it's a gaming beast. Absolute stable 90fps or higher in games that supports it.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Jared April 12, 2025 at 02:04 PM
Snapdragon 695 GPU Clock is 850MHz……Not 950MH.
+8 Reply
Serhii April 12, 2025 at 04:50 PM
In fact, it has a frequency of 840 MHz.
+14 Reply
Avatar
Marky December 25, 2024 at 05:04 PM
It's only reheated cutlet snap 695.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Indigo July 23, 2024 at 05:01 AM
Honestly, it's quite a shame Qualcomm relaunched the almost the same processor after 3 years but with an slight increase in the clock speed, and even more if the we look about the offerings from MediaTek. Qualcomm is destined to loose its market share (and they're losing) against both mediatek and exynos in the middle end segment (largest segment) if they continue with this strategy of relaunching SoC, or made slights improvements with confusing naming schemes.
+41 Reply
Avatar
An Sd lover August 22, 2024 at 12:46 PM
You're correct. Mediatek is a great competition to Qualcomm, but exynos is a waste. Even samsung fans do not love exynos. Also, mediatek has a wide range of chipsets in all the price ranges. Still, Qualcomm is not losing its market share. This chipset is actually upgraded to support higher Android versions, while 695 cant support those. It is quite possible for Qualcomm for publish such chipsets, so they can catch up their market share. I think if they publish remastered editions of 710,720,778,782,845,855,865,870,888, they can really beat mediatek from acquiring smart phone market. What do you think??
+19 Reply
Avatar
Average Joe October 1, 2024 at 07:59 PM
An Sd lover, Dont be a hater kid. Exynos mid range and high end are great this year with 4nm+ Samsung, Exynos 1480 and 2400 are fantastic chips. E2400 has the most powerful GPU and 1480 has great efficiency.
+12 Reply
Avatar
JokYNOS January 18, 2026 at 03:03 AM
Your joking if crappynos is beating them?! No other phone makers are even using that soc besides Samsung forcing it to unexpected consumers until they realize their phones battery drains fast/is overheating. Even Unisoc is being used by many manufacturers in both entry & lower midrange.
0 Reply
Avatar
Rondley June 13, 2024 at 07:34 PM
I think Snapdragon 6S Gen 3 is an overclocked version of Snapdragon 695. The Snapdragon naming scheme is a mess lately. I believe the regular Redmi Note 14 4G might use the 4G version of the Snapdragon 6S Gen 3 next year.
+44 Reply
Avatar
Prashanth September 26, 2025 at 05:18 AM
Rebranded version of 695
+4 Reply
Avatar
Rajakar June 13, 2024 at 08:46 AM
OMG 2021 processor in 2024 ? Snapdragon are you kidding me?
+61 Reply
Avatar
kraxz August 29, 2024 at 08:00 AM
so what? It's an amazing budget 5G chip. 6nm in 2024 is fine. These chips are powerful enough to run basic apps for many years.
+19 Reply
Avatar
Desolate Intention November 30, 2024 at 11:28 PM
kraxz, Make a new damn SoC with the same performance then while switching to a newer node and upgrading the core architecture. They didn't even give it a new modem... Are you seriously defending them?
+12 Reply
Avatar
Enrique June 13, 2024 at 08:44 AM
695 & 6s Gen3 are both the same. There is no difference. In 2024, we are getting an old processor from 2021, only the name has changed. It's old technology at a high price.
+110 Reply