Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6080 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6080

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 6080
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 6080

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (16)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6080
  • Higher GPU frequency (~27%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 6080

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +3%
592015
Dimensity 6080
573460
CPU 237904 218246
GPU 56314 46534
Memory 136317 126743
UX 161480 181937
Total score 592015 573460
Samples [83 tests] [24 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 100.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 53.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 70.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 40 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 62.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 6.38 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 16.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.07 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.04 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 4.04 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 242.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 150
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 11053
Video editing score 3911 5306
Data manipulation score 8663 8410
Photo editing score 18151 20240
Writing score 13129 13119
Phones tested 21 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 -
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Dimensity 6080
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> EXRAnTuTu 11611221
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Dadaba)AnTuTu 11587520
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (nxtzss)AnTuTu 11586686
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-06 (dm1q)AnTuTu 11605816
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-03 (Sasasas)AnTuTu 11564755
Add View all (38)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 6080

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1068 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 136.7 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 June 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6833, MT6833GP
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6080 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1935 (41.2%)
2763 (58.8%)
Total votes: 4698

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
6. MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (9)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (5)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
10. MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6080 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
isa May 30, 2024 at 04:24 PM
The phone with MediaTek 6080 is cheap and runs smoother than Snapdragon 695. It has bigger storage, RAM, and more megapixels in the camera. Additionally, it has a 120Hz display.
+83 Reply
Avatar
Burak December 17, 2025 at 12:09 AM
A device using the Snapdragon 695 might also have the specifications you mentioned. On the other hand, the Snapdragon 695 has higher CPU and GPU performance.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Gayus March 7, 2024 at 08:10 AM
A lower price-to-performance ratio doesn't necessarily make the D6080 better. This comparison is purely about performance, regardless of price.
+77 Reply
Avatar
KYRIEL February 19, 2024 at 06:55 AM
The Snapdragon 695 is superior to the Dimensity 6080 in terms of both CPU and GPU performance. It uses the ARM Cortex-A78 CPU architecture, in contrast to the Dimensity 6080's ARM Cortex-A76. While the Dimensity 6080's CPU operates at a higher frequency, the Snapdragon 695's CPU architecture trumps it with the power of the Cortex-A78. Additionally, the Snapdragon 695's GPU, the Adreno 619, houses more shading units in comparison to the Dimensity 6080's Mali-G57 MC2 GPU. The Mali-G57 MC2 may have higher frequency, but the Adreno 619 bears more shading cores with superior FP32 performance. Due to this, the Adreno 619 delivers better graphical performance than the Mali-G57 MC2. In general, the Snapdragon 695 triumphs by being more powerful in most respects. The Dimensity 6080, while highly praised, is overpriced compared to the Snapdragon 695. In fact, the Dimensity 6080 is nearly on par with the Helio G99, which contradicts its 'Dimensity' label in my opinion.
+42 Reply
Avatar
Ally Jane February 24, 2024 at 01:14 AM
It's not about the specs of the chip, it's all about affordability. A lot of smartphones with the SD 695 chip are overpriced, while the D6080 smartphone can easily be bought for less than $200. This makes the D6080 a better buy. Furthermore, the D6080 is the lowest-end 5G-capable chip that MediaTek offers. It should be compared with the Snapdragon 4th Gen 1 or the 480+ 5G; it shouldn't be compared to the SD 695. If you're planning to buy a smartphone with a 695 chip, it would be wise to check for alternatives. For the same price, you can get a D7050 or a D8020.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Kelvin November 17, 2024 at 10:43 PM
Ally Jane, I got a low budget phone for around $80 and it has 128gb and 6gb ram with the D6080 chip. Only problem is the phone lacks some features but those things aren't noticeable or things that are really need so u get the full power of the chip with a big battery 5000mah for a hd+ display downside
+2 Reply
Avatar
Anallogue February 4, 2025 at 10:06 AM
Kelvin, Lemme guess, itel p55 5g got it here for around $75 top top phone as a modem/ secondary farming device
+1 Reply
Avatar
Burak December 17, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Ally Jane, Nowadays, it's difficult to find most devices using the Dimensity 6080 at affordable prices; there are even devices using the Snapdragon 695 that are more affordable than those using the Dimensity 6080. Especially in areas like battery efficiency, the Snapdragon 695 offers better performance-efficiency compared to the Dimensity 6080.
0 Reply
Avatar
Anon January 13, 2024 at 11:24 AM
I believe Snapdragon 600 series processors are adequate for running most applications. As a basic user, I mostly use office apps such as Outlook, Word, Adobe, and Slack, alongside some banking apps and a few games. The Moto G34, launching in a few days in India on January 17, 2024, is the most affordable phone equipped with this SD 695 processor. It's more affordable than the D6080 phone. I hope to see more phones like this in the future.
+28 Reply
Avatar
Negus January 1, 2024 at 05:52 PM
Imagine creating a processor that's even worse than the 695. It's hard to believe that even in 2024, we're getting processors that are inferior to a mid-range model from 2019.
+63 Reply
Avatar
Dev January 11, 2024 at 03:45 PM
Is the Dimensity 6080 worse than the Snapdragon 695?
+391 Reply
Avatar
Ranz April 29, 2024 at 08:02 AM
Would you like to have a private debate? We can discuss the performance of Dimensity 6080 vs. Snapdragon 695. You seemed to think the former was bad, but it actually performs better when running games compared to the Snapdragon.
+22 Reply
Avatar
sumit December 29, 2023 at 09:56 AM
The issue stems from Snap 695 not permitting video streaming or capturing beyond 1080p.
+61 Reply
Avatar
Venus December 10, 2023 at 08:33 AM
The Snapdragon 695 is practically better in every way. Can someone enlighten me on why the Dimensity 6080 was widely voted better?
+211 Reply
Avatar
GodX December 17, 2023 at 10:59 AM
Mostly, it's because of the people who are using it. Nobody wants their processor to be considered inferior. πŸ˜‚ Some people may have voted for it because it has a 2.4GHz clock speed. Alternatively, it could just be MediaTek employees who are voting for their own product.
+90 Reply
Avatar
Mrd December 27, 2023 at 09:50 AM
I believe it's primarily because smartphones that utilize D6080 are much more affordable.
+92 Reply
EnglishРусский