Snapdragon 765G vs Dimensity 800

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (with Adreno 620 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 800 (Mali-G57 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
612841
CPU 225992 253237
GPU 68730 84195
Memory 118245 103380
UX 185007 172029
Total score 597974 612841
Samples [11 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 87.8 MB/sec 111.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.3 pages/sec 56 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.6 Mpixels/sec 80.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 34.9 images/sec 41.6 images/sec
HDR 55.6 Mpixels/sec 64.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.41 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Photo processing 15.9 images/sec 22.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.58 Mpixels/sec 3.37 Mpixels/sec
Samples 6 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.85 images/sec 2.97 images/sec
Face detection 0.88 images/sec 1.48 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.33 Gpixels/sec 5.57 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 206.3 FPS 320.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 4 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 446 -
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6739 -
Video editing score 5699 -
Data manipulation score 7976 -
Photo editing score 19870 -
Writing score 11348 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 57 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 29 FPS
[Medium]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 55 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Gruk)AnTuTu641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Gruk)AnTuTu641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Guitar91)AnTuTu622520
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-29 (mxrcovx13)AnTuTu571064
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-22 (Artreg)AnTuTu566323
MediaTek Dimensity 800
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-27 (JawDaw5)GeekBench CPU665 / 2221

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 765G and Dimensity 800

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 620 Mali-G57 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 750 MHz 748 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 192 32
Total shaders 384 128
FLOPS 480 Gigaflops 191.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 696 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3200 x 1800 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X52 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2019 December 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7250-AB MT6873
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site MediaTek Dimensity 800 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
528 (42.1%)
726 (57.9%)
Total votes: 1254

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800 and Snapdragon 765G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Oliver Smith March 15, 2021 at 07:10 AM
The Dimensity 800 from Mediatek has performed very well and is ahead of the SD chipset in almost every aspect
+37 Reply
Avatar
Dami Agunbiade February 3, 2021 at 09:36 AM
I feel like Mediatek are there now and they are really starting to rival Snapdragon right now. They have powerful processors and great specs. If they keep it up they could be the more popular choice and seeing by the vote above it seems Mediatek are making a mark.
+5 Reply